![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Go along to get along was the smart thing to do...
Whether it was the right thing to do is open for debate... The Dali Lama is just another bloke who pulls on his BVD's one leg at a time... He is not entitled to special protection under the moving TFR following the President, VP, etc... His airplane is entitled to take the active at a public airport when it's turn comes in the 'first come, first served' sequence as specified in the FAR and AIM... Every time we in GA allow ourselves to be pushed around by the 'authorities' we simply add another brick to the prison they are building around us, and we allow the police officers involved to strengthen their personal belief that their badge gives them the right to "accost and detain" anyone in public areas without either a warrant or belief that person has broken the law... An action that the Constitution and the Amendments specifically forbid... Anyway, I may have have done the same as you, depending upon my level of testosterone at that moment... Or, I may have rhetorically asked them if I were piloting a scheduled airliner with 400 paying passengers would I have to wait on the Dali Lama - and then advised them this is a public airport, I am the public, and I am using it now... The Dali Lama's airplane can take it's turn as federal regulations specify... I might have also pointed out the the Dali Lama represents a religion and by prohibiting my use of public spaces because of his presence the police as an arm of the state are promoting a religion, an act specifically forbidden by both Federal Court and US Supreme Court rulings... And I probably would have gotten in hot water, again. sigh denny |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Sep 2005 04:29:27 -0700, "Denny" wrote in
.com:: we allow the police officers involved to strengthen their personal belief that their badge gives them the right to "accost and detain" anyone in public areas without either a warrant or belief that person has broken the law... An action that the Constitution and the Amendments specifically forbid... As reported on this newsgroup: http://tinyurl.com/ak699 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() a time... He is not entitled to special protection under the moving TFR following the President, VP, etc... I don't believe these public servants deseve special treatment either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|