A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hello Dahli



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 21st 05, 12:29 PM
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Go along to get along was the smart thing to do...
Whether it was the right thing to do is open for debate...
The Dali Lama is just another bloke who pulls on his BVD's one leg at
a time... He is not entitled to special protection under the moving TFR
following the President, VP, etc... His airplane is entitled to take
the active at a public airport when it's turn comes in the 'first come,
first served' sequence as specified in the FAR and AIM...
Every time we in GA allow ourselves to be pushed around by the
'authorities' we simply add another brick to the prison they are
building around us, and we allow the police officers involved to
strengthen their personal belief that their badge gives them the right
to "accost and detain" anyone in public areas without either a warrant
or belief that person has broken the law... An action that the
Constitution and the Amendments specifically forbid...
Anyway, I may have have done the same as you, depending upon my level
of testosterone at that moment... Or, I may have rhetorically asked
them if I were piloting a scheduled airliner with 400 paying passengers
would I have to wait on the Dali Lama - and then advised them this is a
public airport, I am the public, and I am using it now... The Dali
Lama's airplane can take it's turn as federal regulations specify... I
might have also pointed out the the Dali Lama represents a religion and
by prohibiting my use of public spaces because of his presence the
police as an arm of the state are promoting a religion, an act
specifically forbidden by both Federal Court and US Supreme Court
rulings...
And I probably would have gotten in hot water, again. sigh

denny

  #2  
Old September 21st 05, 02:44 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 21 Sep 2005 04:29:27 -0700, "Denny" wrote in
.com::

we allow the police officers involved to
strengthen their personal belief that their badge gives them the right
to "accost and detain" anyone in public areas without either a warrant
or belief that person has broken the law... An action that the
Constitution and the Amendments specifically forbid...


As reported on this newsgroup: http://tinyurl.com/ak699
  #3  
Old September 21st 05, 02:55 PM
JohnH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


a time... He is not entitled to special protection under the moving
TFR following the President, VP, etc...


I don't believe these public servants deseve special treatment either.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.