![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let the nose down too soon and skid the nose gear farther and faster.
Hold it up too long, stall the elevator and drop the nose slower but harder. Use thrust reversers or not? Keep hands on the stick and feet on the brakes? How does all of this happen in the highly automated Airbus cockpit? It seems that the pilot would want to treat the nose gear like he was walking on eggs. Take it as easy as possible. Adding operations like cycling the thrust reversers may add too many unknowns to the situation and may add load to the nose gear. Maybe they keep it as simple as possible, even if that means running over. He had to be ready to react as quickly as possible using any means available if halfway down the runway the nose gear might dig in and jerk the nose to the side. He would fight what ever happened until as metioned above, the pilot finally became a passsenger... It was amazing to watch as the tires ground away, burned, burst open, peeled off, and then the lower half of the wheel and part of the axle were ground down. James |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This isn't the first time the A320 had this problem so the simulators
might have flown this configuration about a gazillion times so procedure should be well understood. "jbaloun" wrote in message oups.com... Let the nose down too soon and skid the nose gear farther and faster. Hold it up too long, stall the elevator and drop the nose slower but harder. Use thrust reversers or not? Keep hands on the stick and feet on the brakes? How does all of this happen in the highly automated Airbus cockpit? It seems that the pilot would want to treat the nose gear like he was walking on eggs. Take it as easy as possible. Adding operations like cycling the thrust reversers may add too many unknowns to the situation and may add load to the nose gear. Maybe they keep it as simple as possible, even if that means running over. He had to be ready to react as quickly as possible using any means available if halfway down the runway the nose gear might dig in and jerk the nose to the side. He would fight what ever happened until as metioned above, the pilot finally became a passsenger... It was amazing to watch as the tires ground away, burned, burst open, peeled off, and then the lower half of the wheel and part of the axle were ground down. James |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"sfb" wrote in message
This isn't the first time the A320 had this problem so the simulators might have flown this configuration about a gazillion times so procedure should be well understood. Airbus' simulators don't have this malfunction programmed. D. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm, the Airbus Simulator that I fly does.
BJ Capt.Doug wrote: "sfb" wrote in message This isn't the first time the A320 had this problem so the simulators might have flown this configuration about a gazillion times so procedure should be well understood. Airbus' simulators don't have this malfunction programmed. D. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jbaloun" wrote in message
Let the nose down too soon and skid the nose gear farther and faster. Hold it up too long, stall the elevator and drop the nose slower but harder. Use thrust reversers or not? Keep hands on the stick and feet on the brakes? How does all of this happen in the highly automated Airbus cockpit? It seems that the pilot would want to treat the nose gear like he was walking on eggs. Take it as easy as possible. Adding operations like cycling the thrust reversers may add too many unknowns to the situation and may add load to the nose gear. Maybe they keep it as simple as possible, even if that means running over. Hadn't thought of that. With the exception of going off the end. What's at the end of that runway? Is there a soft field landing technique for airliners? moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yet another alternator problem | Chris Kennedy | Owning | 7 | July 16th 04 04:28 PM |
Nose gear failure | Greg Esres | Owning | 12 | April 20th 04 11:03 PM |
Garmin fixes moving waypoint problem -- almost | Jon Woellhaf | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | November 28th 03 05:29 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Landing gear door operation | Elliot Wilen | Naval Aviation | 11 | July 7th 03 03:47 PM |