![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Sep 2005 11:02:02 -0700, "Lynne" wrote:
I think what you are forgetting is that the AIM is not regulatory. From the looks of it, it is as if you're expecting to get a violation if you start your engine prior to calling ground. That just won't happen. This thread has gotten out of hand. The bottom line is that if you start your engine, then get your clearance, then call ground, it may end up wasting your time with the engine running if there are delays. But, no matter what, you will never get in "trouble" for starting your engine prior to getting the clearance, or talking to ground. Lynne It's not clear to whom you are responding, but if you are claiming that I am "expecting to get a violation" then your inference is completely wrong. My question, to which no one has yet responded, was why this mostly ignored AIM paragraph is present. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 195 | November 28th 05 10:06 PM |
Touch and Goes versus Full Stop Taxi Backs | Kevin Dunlevy | Piloting | 81 | September 18th 05 09:26 PM |
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U | Judah | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | February 27th 04 06:02 PM |
Q about lost comms on weird clearance | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 34 | February 2nd 04 09:11 PM |
Picking up a Clearance Airborne | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 03 01:31 AM |