A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SSA Dick Johnson sailplane reviews: available to all



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 26th 05, 01:47 AM
MickiMinner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was astonished that I was reading that a few of you believe that SSA
took away stuff from the website, and were upset that they made it a
"members only" access. I don't have anything to do with the SSA
website, but I create websites for other organizations, and the web
pages are part of the services that a member organization offers. Why
should there be access to everyone in the world to all that hard work?
Isn't the web site member only access page a good service? Obviously
it is, because otherwise no one would want to look at it. Does this
mean that you believe that the SSA website should NOT be a service to
the membership, but to everyone? Well, I did notice that the stuff
that is open to the public is fascinating, and encouraging to get new
members and new enthusiasts to soaring. I don't think someone that is
new to soaring would care one way or another who's contest ID belongs
to whom, or Dick Johnson's scientific treatises.......
And if you are interested in those things, you should be a member of
SSA anyway. I honestly believe that people should be part of the
solution, not just complain because they have nothing better to do. I
charge a lot of money to my customers to create web pages for them....I
don't do it for free, and I am sure that the SSA has the same issue as
the companies I work for...the website has to be paid for....and in
this case I imagine membership fees do that paying...

My comments apply to the gliding magazine web page as well. If you
think it is a "shadow" of it's former self, then why not apply yourself
to participate, send information or articles. Send an e-mail with
possible solutions, instead of flames only. Who care's what a flame
message to a webmaster has to say, unless there is something
constructive. P.S. I know John Brain who edits the
glidingmagazine.com webpage..and he is ALSO a one-man show...give the
guy a break...give him a lead into the direction you want the website
to go!

Nick Olson wrote:
Yeah they seemed to take that away from public consumption
when they redid their site -probably didn't even cross
their minds!!

Great that you have found away around it

They seem to kill everything off - look what they've
done to www.glidingmagazine.com - a shadow of what
it once was.

..

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dick Johnson test reports Martin Gregorie Soaring 3 September 14th 05 08:02 PM
Duster Plans For Sale - BJ-1b fullsize sailplane plans WoodHawk Soaring 0 April 25th 05 04:37 AM
David Clarke Reviews Paul General Aviation 42 April 21st 04 02:55 PM
Ultralight sailplane aerotow liability Caracole Soaring 18 April 1st 04 09:17 PM
Dick Johnson - Genesis flight test Mark Soaring 0 November 24th 03 12:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.