![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net... There isn't any. The FARs tend to prohibit things, not authorize them. So where in the FARs is there prohibition of VFR ops above FL180? So you're saying one could operate VFR at FL330? Sure, as long as you're not in Class A airspace. Other than the special exception listed of Glider ops in a blocked off region, where is there airspace that is NOT Class A at FL330? The glider ops at altitudes over FL180 is still Class A, but given special handling. I seriously doubt they are mixing jets and gliders at those altitudes WITHIN those areas. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... Actually VFR glider operations are frequently authorized above 18K' (in class A). Near Minden, NV, ATC simply opens up blocks of airspace allowing gliders to soar in mountain waves. Quite. It's still Class A, but an area receiving special handling (or sumthin to that effect), correct? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... I agree with you that and hold that anything over 18,000 feet is strictly a IFR operation and conducted in 1000 foot increments (also that if someone is at a 500 foot intermediate level they are only passing through that altitude, not cruising. Well, anything over 18,000 feet is NOT strictly an IFR operation. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... Other than the special exception listed of Glider ops in a blocked off region, where is there airspace that is NOT Class A at FL330? Hawaii, the Alaska Peninsula west of longitude 160° 00' 00" West, the California islands Santa Barbara and Farallon, and the Florida keys south of latitude 25° 04' 00" North. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"VFR on top" is an IFR operation requiring a clearance and the adherence to
both IFR and VFR rules at the VFR XX,500' altitudes.. http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/PCG/V.HTM Mike MU-2 "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... No, like Steven said, it is an IFR operation. Well, Newps and a couple others have been saying that VFR on top at 33,500 feet was legit. (or at least they snipped the original statement). I agree with you that and hold that anything over 18,000 feet is strictly a IFR operation and conducted in 1000 foot increments (also that if someone is at a 500 foot intermediate level they are only passing through that altitude, not cruising. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:50:51 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... Other than the special exception listed of Glider ops in a blocked off region, where is there airspace that is NOT Class A at FL330? Hawaii, the Alaska Peninsula west of longitude 160° 00' 00" West, the California islands Santa Barbara and Farallon, and the Florida keys south of latitude 25° 04' 00" North. Finally. Wish this was posted at the BEGINNING of the thread :-) |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "S Herman" wrote in message ... Finally. Wish this was posted at the BEGINNING of the thread :-) It was posted in this thread 2 1/2 days ago. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... "VFR on top" is an IFR operation requiring a clearance and the adherence to both IFR and VFR rules at the VFR XX,500' altitudes.. http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/PCG/V.HTM "ATC authorization for an IFR aircraft to operate in VFR conditions at any appropriate VFR altitude.." Yes, but the point I was making (from the original) was that VFR-OT would be conduced in Class A. Class A, AIUI, contains NO "appropriate VFR altitudes". The first point I disputed, and the one that many responders seemed to have missed, was claiming VFR-OT at 33,500 feet. Below Class A, I'm sure we've all done VFR-OT. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "ATC authorization for an IFR aircraft to operate in VFR conditions at any appropriate VFR altitude.." Yes, but the point I was making (from the original) was that VFR-OT would be conduced in Class A. Class A, AIUI, contains NO "appropriate VFR altitudes". The first point I disputed, and the one that many responders seemed to have missed, was claiming VFR-OT at 33,500 feet. Below Class A, I'm sure we've all done VFR-OT. Is all airspace at 33,500 feet Class A? |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Barrow wrote:
I agree with you that and hold that anything over 18,000 feet is strictly a IFR operation and conducted in 1000 foot increments (also that if someone is at a 500 foot intermediate level they are only passing through that altitude, not cruising. Ok, then please 'splain my glider operations? NO IFR pilot on board, glider not IFR certified, no transponder, VFR pilot on board, unable to hold altitude. I assert this is a legal operation... VFR, above FL180. Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocation!" Eberhard -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jer'at'frii.com WEB http://users.frii.com/jer/ C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider, FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot, BM218 HAM N0FZD, 233 Young Eagles! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |