![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 7tV_e.6370$tX3.1051@trndny06,
George Patterson wrote: No doubt that as automation increases, piloting skills required decrease. That may contribute to greater safety if adequate redundancy is employed, but it also takes a certain charm out of flying an airplane. Then increased automation should allow pilots to safely fly aircraft which would otherwise be very challenging; faster, less stable, etc.. That might restore a certain amount of charm. That may be true of larger, faster airplanes, but is not true in the case of the Cirrus. Even the SR22 isn't any faster than other light aircraft that possess more stable flying characteristics. I don't know what would be charming or exciting about sitting around while the AP flies the airplane. I would be happy to have AP assistance during the mundane parts of cruise and approach, but having to rely on the AP to keep the airplane in stable flight is something that I can't honestly say that I would like. I'm trying to figure out why anyone would buy a Cirrus. I know people who own them, but don't know why they were chosen over other aircraft (even when compared with the Columbias). JKG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan,
Even the SR22 isn't any faster than other light aircraft that possess more stable flying characteristics. more stable? How and where did you get the idea that the SR22is not? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Jonathan, Even the SR22 isn't any faster than other light aircraft that possess more stable flying characteristics. more stable? How and where did you get the idea that the SR22is not? Back two or three days ago, in this thread. The observation came from one or two Cirrus drivers. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even the SR22 isn't any faster than other light
aircraft that possess more stable flying characteristics. more stable? How and where did you get the idea that the SR22is not? Back two or three days ago, in this thread. The observation came from one or two Cirrus drivers. Wasn't me. Mine's quite stable. KR |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ken Reed wrote: Even the SR22 isn't any faster than other light aircraft that possess more stable flying characteristics. more stable? How and where did you get the idea that the SR22is not? Back two or three days ago, in this thread. The observation came from one or two Cirrus drivers. Wasn't me. Mine's quite stable. I think it was me, and I never said it wasn't stable, just that it's hard to adjust the pitch trim for level flight at high speed because it's electric. That's very different from "unstable". rg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-10-01, Ron Garret wrote:
I think it was me, and I never said it wasn't stable, just that it's hard to adjust the pitch trim for level flight at high speed because it's electric. That's very different from "unstable". Seems to be true with all electric trimmers. I usually find myself giving up and using the manual trim wheel (if available). It's not particlarly bothersome in most electric-trim-only planes though. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dylan Smith wrote: On 2005-10-01, Ron Garret wrote: I think it was me, and I never said it wasn't stable, just that it's hard to adjust the pitch trim for level flight at high speed because it's electric. That's very different from "unstable". Seems to be true with all electric trimmers. Yes, this problem is not unique to the Cirrus. I usually find myself giving up and using the manual trim wheel (if available). It's not particlarly bothersome in most electric-trim-only planes though. It's not particularly bothersome in the Cirrus either because the autopilot is standard equipment :-) rg |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:55:40 -0000, Dylan Smith
wrote: On 2005-10-01, Ron Garret wrote: I think it was me, and I never said it wasn't stable, just that it's hard to adjust the pitch trim for level flight at high speed because it's electric. That's very different from "unstable". Seems to be true with all electric trimmers. I usually find myself You should fly one of the early Debonairs. A quarter inch of trim wheel movement will either push you down into the seat or lift you right out of it. the fixed that after about 60 or so planes were built, but that mechanical trim is very coarse. giving up and using the manual trim wheel (if available). It's not particlarly bothersome in most electric-trim-only planes though. On our old Cherokee it was far easier to adjust and hold trim with the button than the wheel. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 04:25:12 GMT, Ken Reed wrote:
Even the SR22 isn't any faster than other light aircraft that possess more stable flying characteristics. more stable? How and where did you get the idea that the SR22is not? Back two or three days ago, in this thread. The observation came from one or two Cirrus drivers. Wasn't me. Mine's quite stable. Stable is a relative term. It depends on what you have been flying. Typically, Fast and stable used to describe the same airplane is an oxymoron. Even with that big wing and light wing loading the Bo is near neutral in stability. (Mine has a slightly lighter loading than a Cherokee, but that hummer is slippery) Put a 172 or Cherokee pilot into a Cirrus or Bonanza and see how well they do at holding altitude. Take all three and trim them for level flight. Push the yoke down and then let go. How long does it take to stabilize? The Cherokee and 172 will bob the nose up and down a few times and in short order will be flying as if nothing happened. The Bo will do a slow oscillation and take its time about coming back "if it does". We have a husband and wife flying an SR-22 who say the same about theirs. They purchased a new one just over a year ago, put 700 hours on that thing and have already traded it in for a new one. I'd say they are "experienced" pilots. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com KR Roger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |