![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jmarc99 wrote: After having read all the posts in the previous thread, no one said a word about de right airspeed to keep along the final approach... whatever this is done with a sideslip or crabbing. Beware of flying indicated airspeed during a slipping approach. The pitot/static system on some giders will give large indicated airspeed errors when slipping. As an extreme example my ASW-19 read zero airspeed in a full rudder slip, probably due to the nose pot pitot. You need to know your glider and fly the appropriate attitude rather than the ASI. Andy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy" wrote in message oups.com... Jmarc99 wrote: After having read all the posts in the previous thread, no one said a word about de right airspeed to keep along the final approach... whatever this is done with a sideslip or crabbing. Beware of flying indicated airspeed during a slipping approach. The pitot/static system on some giders will give large indicated airspeed errors when slipping. As an extreme example my ASW-19 read zero airspeed in a full rudder slip, probably due to the nose pot pitot. You need to know your glider and fly the appropriate attitude rather than the ASI. Andy Sure Andy. I am pretty well aware about the false reading of the indicated airspeed. I stick to visually have the right angle with horizon at all time in order to get a steady right speed during base and final. It seams that everybody miss the right question in this thread.. What is the right airspeed to decide to get, when the wind is NOT perfectly alligned with the runway? When you have 15 knots wind, with gusts at 20... at 0 degree with the runway , you'll calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, right ? at 45 degree ... calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, right.. maybe ? at 90 degree ... calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, right.. no ? at 135 degree ... calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, no.. right.. maybe ? at 180 degree (wind right from the back) ... calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, always? or 1.3 Vs + 20 knots at all times, whatever the wind direction with the runway ? Or only 1.3 Vs when the wind will be at the back during the final ? The questtion is.. WHAT IS THE CALCULATED SPEED do you wish to get during the base and final, according with the wind angle with the runway. Do you take care the gusts speed or not in your calculation ? Is anyone can answer that simple question? jmarc.. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jmarc99 wrote:
When you have 15 knots wind, with gusts at 20... at 0 degree with the runway , you'll calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, right ? at 45 degree ... calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, right.. maybe ? at 90 degree ... calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, right.. no ? at 135 degree ... calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, no.. right.. maybe ? at 180 degree (wind right from the back) ... calculate 1.3 Vs + 15, always? or 1.3 Vs + 20 knots at all times, whatever the wind direction with the runway ? Or only 1.3 Vs when the wind will be at the back during the final ? The questtion is.. WHAT IS THE CALCULATED SPEED do you wish to get during the base and final, according with the wind angle with the runway. Do you take care the gusts speed or not in your calculation ? I can tell you what I'd do in England (that's important, because in very different conditions, such as hot country or mountains, I'd be asking local pilots for advice). 1. Nil wind landing speed for an airfield or flat field is 1.3 Vs. 10 kt more for landing uphill, even more for a steep slope. 2. Plus half estimated max wind speed (i.e. gusts, not the average, because you're giving yourself a margin for the worst that can happen). So if the wind is 15kt gusting 20kt I'd add 10kt. Adding all the wind speed is too much for a field landing, giving you a closer view of the far hedge than is comfortable. I don't have different landing speeds for runways and fields because it would be too easy to use the wrong one under pressure. 3. If the wind is cross, there's a useful rule of thumb to reduce it by 1/6 for every 10 degrees from 90 to get the headwind component. 90 degrees cross = 0/6 (i.e. no head wind), 60 degrees cross=3/6 (half head wind), 30 degrees cross=6/6 (full head wind). So in our example, if the wind is 15/20kt at 60 degrees I'll treat it as gusting 10kt headwind and add 5 kt. 4. Finally, you may need to add a margin for expected wind shear, curlover etc - here you need advice from local pilots. If you've got yourself into the situation where you only have a bad field you will need to compromise, in which case remember that undershooting at flying speed is usually worse than running into the far hedge at a lower speed. Where I fly the fields are big and there are few hills, so input from those who fly in more challenging areas would be worth reading. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Reed wrote:
1. ... 10 kt more for landing uphill, even more for a steep slope. .... 2. Plus half estimated max wind speed .... 3. If the wind is cross, there's a useful rule of thumb to reduce it by 1/6 for every 10 degrees from 90 to get the headwind component. And when exactly are you going to calculate all this? :-P I'm just doing normal approach speed plus 1/2 estimated wind, no matter what direction (except tailwind, of course). Has always worked good enough for me. BTW: 5 kt for upslope is enough, even for steep slopes. But when the field is long enough, 10 kn don't hurt, either. Stefan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
And when exactly are you going to calculate all this? :-P On downwind leg, and I won't do the full calculation. Something like 90 degrees= nil wind, 60 = half wind, 30=full headwind. In the example this gives me +0, +5 or +10. Close enough. If your glider floats well, like my Open Cirrus, then the extra few knots is significant. If I land 10kt over the correct speed for the day, I'll float more than twice as far after the roundout. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Reed" wrote in message ... On downwind leg, and I won't do the full calculation. Something like 90 degrees= nil wind, 60 = half wind, 30=full headwind. In the example this gives me +0, +5 or +10. Close enough. If your glider floats well, like my Open Cirrus, then the extra few knots is significant. If I land 10kt over the correct speed for the day, I'll float more than twice as far after the roundout. Hi Chris, You wrote that something like 90 degrees= nil wind. So if someone do a slip in the wind direction in order to sayt alligned with the runway during the final leg, the pitch angle of the sailplane is somewhere greater than supposed! In this case, with 90 degree wind, the sailplaine have to travel a longer way through the air mass. Though, the sailplane fly more faster than supposed, and the pilot doesn't use much airbrake! Is that what effectively happen in that wind condition? Jmarc |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jmarc99 wrote:
You wrote that something like 90 degrees= nil wind. So if someone do a slip in the wind direction in order to sayt alligned with the runway during the final leg, the pitch angle of the sailplane is somewhere greater than supposed! In this case, with 90 degree wind, the sailplaine have to travel a longer way through the air mass. Though, the sailplane fly more faster than supposed, and the pilot doesn't use much airbrake! Is that what effectively happen in that wind condition? Jmarc I'm not suer I understand the question properly. My crosswind landing technique is to crab into wind, and then kick off the drift after the roundout. This works fine for, say, a 10kt crosswind at 90 degrees, and at that wind speed there's no real danger of wind shear. However, if the wind is gusting 20kts or more at 90 degrees, that's outside the demonstrated crosswind limits of my glider. Ideally, I choose a better landing direction. If I had no choice (e.g. poor or late field selection), then this would be one of those "interesting" landings which test one's improvisational and piloting skills. I'd be using a combination of crabbing and slipping, to give me less drift to kick off,and I'd certainly add 10 kts or more to allow for gusts and wind shear unless that seemed more dangerous than approaching at a slower speed. I guess the point I was really trying to make is that if on every landing you add extra speed for "safety", the result is that you never learn to land with the minimum safe energy. This is a skill that I think every XC pilot needs. However, in gusty or high winds, you have to allow for the possibility of needing extra control authority or suddenly losing 15kts airspeed through wind shear. So minimum safe energy landings are for benign conditions. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
A new direction for an old thread: Crosswind landings | [email protected] | Soaring | 96 | March 4th 05 01:22 AM |
Inaccurate airspeed indicator | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | April 20th 04 12:08 AM |
Strong crosswind landings! | Toks Desalu | Piloting | 12 | April 19th 04 07:43 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |