![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:17:17 -0700, Eric Greenwell
wrote: Any glider can suffer partial control failure from connection problems, freezing, stick or linkage blockage, undetected damage, mechanical failures, or improper repairs. I think giving pilots some experience in these situations with an experienced instructor would be an asset. Hmm... it depends on the type of glider, type of damage, pilot skill, and luck. I think an airbrake failure is survivable, but any other kind of primary flight control failure needs a lot of luck to be survivable. For example, the seemingly not-so-important rudder: I once saw a halfways safe no-damage landing of a Twin 2 with a jammed rudder - but a jammed rudder killed two very experienced pilots in a DG-500M when they were unable to touchdown in a controlled manner out of a sideslip. Basically I think it's not a good solution to find myself slowly losing control of your glider while on final at 150 ft although I could have bailed out safely 2.000 ft higher. At least I can blame myself for trying to be a hero till impact. My decision for myself is clear: As soon as I'm not absolutely sure anymore to have the glider under control, I bail out. I have no need for control experiments at low altitudes where the slightest mistake is definitely going to kill me - especially if the alternative is a relatively safe bail-out out of a halfways controlled glider. Bye Andreas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andreas Maurer wrote:
My decision for myself is clear: As soon as I'm not absolutely sure anymore to have the glider under control, I bail out. I have no need for control experiments at low altitudes where the slightest mistake is definitely going to kill me - especially if the alternative is a relatively safe bail-out out of a halfways controlled glider. Yes, but deciding when that happens is the hard part, well was for me anyway. I have had 2 partial primary control failures (in 4 years of gliding), landed safely each time, but I still wonder if I made the right decision. The first was in LS4, at about 7000 feet and at that time I had about 120 hrs in about two years of gliding. It was a rented ship away from my own club. The ship just had its manual, was test flown by its owner and I have flown it for 4 days prior to this incident. I do a pcc before each flight and did it then. The aileron movement was not the smoothest but I was assured it was OK. Anyway at about 7000 I needed a large aileron deflection to the right and about half way there was a definite stop. Stupidly (if automatically) I applied a fair force and powered through the obstruction. I remember thinking at the same time something like "you idiot, what if it does not come back". Well it did come back, I did some testing, the event did not repeat in a pattern that I could discern, but as the obstruction only occurred at about half travel so I have decided to land. I have increased speed to about 70 kts, where only small deflections were needed and landed normally. I have only recently found out that there was a serious problem that was rectified. The second incident happened in my club ship, a Hornet. Once again a DI, including a PCC was done. I have flown for about 2 hours without an incident when I went to pull up quite sharply into a thermal when the elevator come to a full stop with what felt like a soft clunk. Anyway once again I did some testing and found that with what was a full elevator I could fly no slower then 55 kts and a bit more with airbrakes. The controls felt perfectly normal in the remaining range. Anyway, once again I decided to land. When I descended to about 2000 ft AGL I put away the air brakes to set up a landing pattern. At stage I found that I could not fly slower then about 65kts. Anyway, a bit of adrenalin must have manifested itself at this point and a sharper tug on the elevator freed the control. I have landed normally. When we removed the elevator we have discovered a piece of lead ballast in the tail. It was put in upside down and moved in flight wedging under a flange on the elevator pushrod (hence the soft clunk). Clearly a few safety issues here - the use of the ballast was not universally known by club members, checking for it was not part of the DI and apart from the control locking there could have been a C of G problem for lighter pilots. Anyway, these issues have been addressed. The second incident came about 3 month after the first one and I am sure both had a significant impact on my flying confidence. In any case, to this day I am not sure that I have done the right thing by remaining with the glider. In both cases I had a stable platform to depart and I have some 100 jumps to my name, admittedly some 30 years earlier, so I think I would have been relatively comfortable jumping. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul wrote:
In any case, to this day I am not sure that I have done the right thing by remaining with the glider. In both cases I had a stable platform to depart and I have some 100 jumps to my name, admittedly some 30 years earlier, so I think I would have been relatively comfortable jumping. This is interesting, because some people recommend all gliders making at least one practice jump, partly on the theory they won't be so reluctant to jump when they need to. Maybe it's more wishful thinking than good advice, but I don't know of any "post jump" interviews to see if the jumpee agreed with the theory. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
This is interesting, because some people recommend all gliders making at least one practice jump, Make that "glider pilots". -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I've been making spoilerless landings for years. Of course, the
ships I've flown most don't have them... but I had my smart@$$ hat on and just couldn't help myself... Jack Womack |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
Well, I've been making spoilerless landings for years. Of course, the ships I've flown most don't have them... but I had my smart@$$ hat on and just couldn't help myself... Well, then, how about landing with just one flap? -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Slingsby Kestrel 19 is one glider which needs care if sideslipping close
to the ground. The rudder overbalances, and it needs a considerable force on the rudder to take the sideslip off. If you have no rudder, how do you get it out of the sideslip once you have rudder overbalance? I can't think of a way to do it. One friend of mine had his Kestrel 19 go out of control in yaw shortly after releasing from aerotow at about 2,000ft. QFE. In fact the rudder had fallen off, though sitting in the cockpit he did not know this. He baled out while the glider was flying level though not under full control; I and everyone else at the time thought he was sensible to do this. The rudder drive had broken, all Kestrels were modified as a result. W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). "Andreas Maurer" wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:17:17 -0700, Eric Greenwell wrote: Any glider can suffer partial control failure from connection problems, freezing, stick or linkage blockage, undetected damage, mechanical failures, or improper repairs. I think giving pilots some experience in these situations with an experienced instructor would be an asset. Hmm... it depends on the type of glider, type of damage, pilot skill, and luck. I think an airbrake failure is survivable, but any other kind of primary flight control failure needs a lot of luck to be survivable. For example, the seemingly not-so-important rudder: I once saw a halfways safe no-damage landing of a Twin 2 with a jammed rudder - but a jammed rudder killed two very experienced pilots in a DG-500M when they were unable to touchdown in a controlled manner out of a sideslip. Basically I think it's not a good solution to find myself slowly losing control of your glider while on final at 150 ft although I could have bailed out safely 2.000 ft higher. At least I can blame myself for trying to be a hero till impact. My decision for myself is clear: As soon as I'm not absolutely sure anymore to have the glider under control, I bail out. I have no need for control experiments at low altitudes where the slightest mistake is definitely going to kill me - especially if the alternative is a relatively safe bail-out out of a halfways controlled glider. Bye Andreas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Cuban Missle Crisis - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 09:14 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |