A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ethanol Mandate for Iowa?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 1st 05, 12:27 AM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:42:58 -0500, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:


"Sylvain" wrote in message
...
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

The problem is if you use a gallon of Ethanol to produce 0.99 gallons of
Ethanol all of the fuel produced will go into production and you are
going to have to add .01 petro just to break even.


then could it still have a practical use as a means of storing
energy instead? I mean, producing ethanol using the output of
say nuclear plants (ok, replace that with wind mills or whatever
takes your fancy if 'nuclear' is against your religion); it was
my (probably mistaken) understanding that the output of a nuclear
plant could not easily be throttled up or down...

any recommendation about some good reading on the subject of
alternative fuel technologies?

--Sylvain


That is still not an efficient way to store energy. But how about this? We
get rid of the of some of the unneeded regulations around Nuclear plants and
move to a point where all electrical production is created with nuclear
power and only use petro based fuel where they are the most effecient form
of energy storage. i.e. cars, trucks, and airplanes.

Nuclear is feared because the first thing it was used for was blowing up two
cities in Japan. If the first use of electricity had been for the electric
chair we'd have people out there chanting "No more watts."


Thankfully Edison failed at his attempts!

http://www.roadsideamerica.com/pet/topsy.html

Edison was out to provide bad PR for Tesla (Westinghouse) new A/C form of
electricity generation of power delivery. Edison thought if the showed
the "horrors of A/C power compared to D/C" (paraphrasing), no one would
use it.

On a side note, many speculate that a fair number of Edison's inventions
actually originated on Tesla's drawing board. When they parted ways,
Edison did pretty much everything he could do to cause financial and
personal woe on Telsa. Sadly, Edison was greatly successful in his
attempts. Mysteriously, Tesla's lab burned down from unknown causes at
the height on Edison's ire for Tesla. Seems Edison wasn't such a nice guy
after all.

Greg


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ethanol Powered Airplane Certified In Brazil Victor Owning 4 March 30th 05 09:10 PM
Sugar-powered plane unveiled Mal Soaring 12 October 26th 04 07:49 AM
Local Amoco now blending ethanol Ben Smith Owning 5 April 1st 04 04:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.