![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote in news:wcn%e.1166$lb.94797
@news1.epix.net: Oh, just the last time that I looked at an F-14, F-15, F-111 or F-18. Ok, the -18 is maybe a little closer to a mid-wing like the F-16, but I believe the wing is still above the CG of the airplane and that is what defines a high wing to me. OK, change "high wing" to "wing over your head" and my point is still valid.... I believe all of the above have the wing out of the pilots vision.... -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ET wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote in news:wcn%e.1166$lb.94797 @news1.epix.net: Oh, just the last time that I looked at an F-14, F-15, F-111 or F-18. Ok, the -18 is maybe a little closer to a mid-wing like the F-16, but I believe the wing is still above the CG of the airplane and that is what defines a high wing to me. OK, change "high wing" to "wing over your head" and my point is still valid.... I believe all of the above have the wing out of the pilots vision.... Well, few, if any (I can't think of one), of the modern jet fighters has the wing anywhere near the pilot's head. It is usually 10 or more feet behind the pilot's head. Yes, all of the above have the wing out of the pilot's line of vision unless they are looking pretty much backwards. And almost all light airplanes have the wing in the pilot's line of vision, be they low or high wing. I could see downward and navigate and make select emergency landing sites MUCH easier in my Skylane than I can in the club Arrow I now fly. Yes, the Arrow makes it easier to see the runway during the approach to landing, but I spend 95% of my time enroute, unless I'm doing touch and goes in the pattern. I'd much rather be able to see well 95% of the time than less than 5% of the time. And even in the pattern, you can see the runway better all but a small fraction of the time when you are turning. And when you roll level on base, you can easily see the runway again to time your turn to final. I'm always amazed at pilots who can't seem to handle this without seeing a constant view of the runway. Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ET opined
Matt Whiting wrote in news:wcn%e.1166$lb.94797 : Oh, just the last time that I looked at an F-14, F-15, F-111 or F-18. Ok, the -18 is maybe a little closer to a mid-wing like the F-16, but I believe the wing is still above the CG of the airplane and that is what defines a high wing to me. OK, change "high wing" to "wing over your head" and my point is still valid.... I believe all of the above have the wing out of the pilots vision.... Whether jet fighters are high wing or midwing is an interesting question... But how many high wing /piston/ fighters were made[1]? -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? 1. biplanes don't count. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ash Wyllie wrote:
But how many high wing /piston/ fighters were made[1]? There were several. The Fokker D-8 was an excellent fighter for it's day. France made another in the 30s. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PZL P.11 and P.24
http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevo...other/pzl.html Northrop P-61 (okay, it's arguable) Fokker D.8 The Russians also had an oddball fighter that was a biplane for landing and takeoff but retracted the lower wing into the upper wing for cruise and combat. It was pretty vulnerable during the retraction process . . . Seth "Ash Wyllie" wrote in message ... ET opined Matt Whiting wrote in news:wcn%e.1166$lb.94797 : Oh, just the last time that I looked at an F-14, F-15, F-111 or F-18. Ok, the -18 is maybe a little closer to a mid-wing like the F-16, but I believe the wing is still above the CG of the airplane and that is what defines a high wing to me. OK, change "high wing" to "wing over your head" and my point is still valid.... I believe all of the above have the wing out of the pilots vision.... Whether jet fighters are high wing or midwing is an interesting question... But how many high wing /piston/ fighters were made[1]? -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? 1. biplanes don't count. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Wow - heard on the air... (long) | Nathan Young | Piloting | 68 | July 25th 05 06:51 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |