![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Just to dive in here, with a slightly off track comment. The benefits of extra voltage on the radio transmit are not worth the effort. A quick trawl through the figures shows that you need to make an x10 output improvement in output to hear/notice it at the other end. Changing the coax feeding the antenna to a good quality low loss grade, followed by tuning the antenna for the frequency range your using, would give more useful benefits. The receive improvement gained here, is also not to be sniffed at. I wonder how many have put a VSWR meter on their setup? Any SWR above 1.5 is going to be a detrimental. On most gliders I would estimate that the power reaching the antenna is only 50% of that, that left the radio!! Malcolm - G3REM (but only a poor, K6 pilot) "T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message ... "bumper" wrote: By the time most modern radios would start to falter, the battery is already pretty much discharged. Using an up-converter is this circumstance would only result in a very limited amount of additional radio use - - along with a very discharged battery! I don't think he was advocating an up-converter to increase voltage when the battery was dying. I think he was suggesting it for the additional transmitted power you would get from 14 volts even when the 12V battery is fresh. Even if it was practical (which I doubt) you'd be losing battery capacity to gain the higher voltage - that's probably not a good trade-off for reasons discussed in Tim Mara's post. T o d d P a t t i s t - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Changing the coax feeding the antenna to a good quality low loss grade, followed by tuning the antenna for the frequency range your using, would give more useful benefits. The receive improvement gained here, is also not to be sniffed at. Just how do you tune an antenna? In the old CB days we would ajdust the lenght of the antenna until we got a good SWR. I can't see cutting into the tail of my LS6 to do that. Tony V. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Verhulst wrote:
Changing the coax feeding the antenna to a good quality low loss grade, followed by tuning the antenna for the frequency range your using, would give more useful benefits. The receive improvement gained here, is also not to be sniffed at. Just how do you tune an antenna? In the old CB days we would ajdust the lenght of the antenna until we got a good SWR. I can't see cutting into the tail of my LS6 to do that. Tony V. I measured it in my LS4 once, and saw something really good, about 1.1:1. If Malcolm believes you need a 10X factor in transmitter power to make a noticeable improvement, then I suppose he'd also believe you need to increase the radiated power 10X by tuning in order to make a difference. No factory installation is going to be subject to that kind of improvement, unless you have an open or short somewhere in the system. -Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another interesting observation:
In a recent evaluation of our club's glider batteries (all 7AH 12v), we observed a very significant variation in weight. Is it reasonable to deduce that a light battery cannot provide the same hours of operation as a well designed heavier battery of the same physical size? If so then we should also be watching out for cheap-and-nasty batteries, where the manufacturer is skimping on the lead content! Cheers, Jim Kelly. "Malcolm Austin" wrote in message ... Hi, Just to dive in here, with a slightly off track comment. The benefits of extra voltage on the radio transmit are not worth the effort. A quick trawl through the figures shows that you need to make an x10 output improvement in output to hear/notice it at the other end. Changing the coax feeding the antenna to a good quality low loss grade, followed by tuning the antenna for the frequency range your using, would give more useful benefits. The receive improvement gained here, is also not to be sniffed at. I wonder how many have put a VSWR meter on their setup? Any SWR above 1.5 is going to be a detrimental. On most gliders I would estimate that the power reaching the antenna is only 50% of that, that left the radio!! Malcolm - G3REM (but only a poor, K6 pilot) "T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message ... "bumper" wrote: By the time most modern radios would start to falter, the battery is already pretty much discharged. Using an up-converter is this circumstance would only result in a very limited amount of additional radio use - - along with a very discharged battery! I don't think he was advocating an up-converter to increase voltage when the battery was dying. I think he was suggesting it for the additional transmitted power you would get from 14 volts even when the 12V battery is fresh. Even if it was practical (which I doubt) you'd be losing battery capacity to gain the higher voltage - that's probably not a good trade-off for reasons discussed in Tim Mara's post. T o d d P a t t i s t - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Battery Question | [email protected] | Soaring | 19 | September 15th 05 01:38 AM |
Batteries, charger for Yaesu handheld - NiCad or NiMH? | David Herman | Owning | 10 | November 7th 04 04:30 PM |
14 Volt Gel Cell? | Joe Allbritten | Soaring | 32 | May 11th 04 01:37 AM |
Icom A5 Battery Tester ?? | Harry Gordon | Piloting | 5 | January 10th 04 01:29 PM |
Battery life...how to test? | Jim Kelly | Soaring | 2 | July 11th 03 09:12 PM |