![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
Thanks for the replies, not sure if training in the US would be the best way to go, as if I understand correctly, the licence would only allow you to fly American registered planes, and I'm not sure how many of those there are owned by the local flying clubs. Unless you can train for the different licences in the US? Regards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ice blonde wrote:
Unless you can train for the different licences in the US? There used to be an outfit down in Florida that offered training for the British license. I don't know how it's doing since 9/11. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Check it out: http://www.ukft.com/
"George Patterson" wrote in message news:gFF0f.3908$WD5.632@trndny06... Ice blonde wrote: Unless you can train for the different licences in the US? There used to be an outfit down in Florida that offered training for the British license. I don't know how it's doing since 9/11. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seth Masia wrote:
Check it out: http://www.ukft.com/ Cool! Lancaster, PA would be a great place to learn to fly. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
Seth Masia wrote: Check it out: http://www.ukft.com/ Now that does look interesting..... But I'm not going to be flitting off to do anything in a hurry :-) Have never been to the Mid West, but your not selling it very well ;-) We have a place called Boston in Lincs over here, its a bit like that, really really flat and cabbages for as far as the eye can see...! Now a quick question, is there much difference in flying a piper 4 seat, rather than a Cessna 2 seat? I have a willing soul who would love to come up for a ride, and it would be a good excuse to have another lesson, but I wouldn't want to try learning in two very different planes at once, that would just be confusing. Many thanks |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Oct 2005 12:31:50 -0700, "Ice blonde"
wrote: Hi all Seth Masia wrote: Check it out: http://www.ukft.com/ Now that does look interesting..... But I'm not going to be flitting off to do anything in a hurry :-) Have never been to the Mid West, but your not selling it very well ;-) We have a place called Boston in Lincs over here, its a bit like that, really really flat and cabbages for as far as the eye can see...! Now a quick question, is there much difference in flying a piper 4 seat, rather than a Cessna 2 seat? I have a willing soul who would love to come up for a ride, and it would be a good excuse to have another lesson, but I wouldn't want to try learning in two very different planes at once, that would just be confusing. Many thanks I'm learning in the UK. Took a trial lesson in a cessna and also a trial in a piper 4 seater. I am learning in a Piper. It felt nicer to fly in having had an hour in each. Disadvantage is it costs more to learn in a Piper. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ice blonde wrote:
Now a quick question, is there much difference in flying a piper 4 seat, rather than a Cessna 2 seat? Yes. The Piper is heavier and low wing. That makes it less likely to bounce around when the air is a bit unstable. It takes longer to get it off the ground. It has a tendency to "float" a little when landing. It's a bit heavier on the controls. It's faster. The low wing makes it a poor sightseeing platform. On the other hand, you can see in the direction you're turning, so the runway stays in sight while you come in to land. There are a few other differences, but they don't make any difference at this stage of your training. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The four-seat Piper is probably 160 hp, while the two-seat Cessna is 105 hp.
The bigger plane will feel heavier and more stable. With two people aboard it will climb more quickly. It will feel like moving from an old Mini to a new four-door Toyota . . . There's also a difference in visibility. The Cessna, because of the high wing, gives you an unrestricted view downward, so it's great for sightseeing and taking pix. You can probably flip the windows open a bit for this purpose. It's easy to climb in and out of the plane through big doors on either side, and the wing provides shade on hot days, a little shelter on wet ones. When you fly the landing pattern, you lose sight of the runway for about 20 seconds in each turn because the wing blocks the view, which can be disconcerting until you're used to it. The Piper, with its low wing, requires you clamber up to enter, and it has a single door on the right, so it's a bit more awkward to load. Visibility in the pattern is grand -- you can eyeball the runway all the way through your turns. You can't look straight down through the wing; you can't see the landing gear. And you can fuel the plane without having to climb up to the wing. On the other hand, pre-flight with the low wing means I have to roll around on the tarmac to drain fuel and inspect the gear. Which do you prefer? Given equal power and seating, it just depends on how you use the airplane. I trained in Cessnas, own a Piper. For purely practical purposes, I prefer the high wing -- If I were still flying search and rescue, if I were flying big cargo and elderly passengers, or operating off a grass strip, I'd own a Cessna. But I do love the Piper and the low wing feels a bit more sporting. Seth "Ice blonde" wrote in message oups.com... Hi all Seth Masia wrote: Check it out: http://www.ukft.com/ Now that does look interesting..... But I'm not going to be flitting off to do anything in a hurry :-) Have never been to the Mid West, but your not selling it very well ;-) We have a place called Boston in Lincs over here, its a bit like that, really really flat and cabbages for as far as the eye can see...! Now a quick question, is there much difference in flying a piper 4 seat, rather than a Cessna 2 seat? I have a willing soul who would love to come up for a ride, and it would be a good excuse to have another lesson, but I wouldn't want to try learning in two very different planes at once, that would just be confusing. Many thanks |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Oct 2005 11:07:16 -0700, "Ice blonde"
wrote: I understand correctly, the licence would only allow you to fly American registered planes, No, the certificate (as it's called in the U.S.) is transferable to the UK. British pilots regularly train here to take advantage of the lower prices, good weather (I would suggest Arizona, but only in the winter ![]() now, what with Mohammed Atta and his friends. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
New Flying Wings publication | mat Redsell | Soaring | 0 | August 3rd 05 06:23 PM |
Interesting Resume (V Long) | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 24 | September 13th 04 06:44 AM |
'They want to ban recreational flying...' | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Piloting | 28 | July 22nd 03 07:20 PM |