A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Runway needs of F4U and F-4 ????



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 5th 05, 04:58 AM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

vincent p. norris wrote:

Anyone here old enough to know the take-of distance of an F4U under
ordinary circumstances? (i.e., not loaded to the gills with ammo,
drop tanks, bombs, etc) How about landing roll?


From the Pilot's Handbook for the F4U-1, Hard Surface Runway, Sea
Level, Standard Day, no wind:
Takeoff
at 11,700#, Ground Roll 680 ft, 1,350 ft to clear 50'
At 13,100#, Ground Roll 910 ft, 1,820' to clear 50'
Landing
at 11,000#, 50 degrees flap 2080' to clear 50', 970' ground roll.

For the F4U-5, same conditions, 12,800#,
Takeoff Ground Roll is 730', 1370' to clear 50'
Landing, at 12,000#, 2000' to clear 50', 1050' ground run.



(I realize the answers vary by altitude, temperature, wind, etc.,
but would like just a "round number" answer.)

Can anyone provide the same info for an F-4?


My F-4 books are tucked away at the moment - give me a day.

--
Pete Stickney
Java Man knew nothing about coffee.
  #2  
Old October 6th 05, 01:30 AM
vincent p. norris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From the Pilot's Handbook for the F4U-1.......,

My F-4 books are tucked away at the moment - give me a day.


Thanks, Peter.

vince norris
  #3  
Old October 6th 05, 04:03 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

F4, combat load, my DaNang rule of thumb, max gross+, 1004, sea level,
4400 feet to lift-off. I say max gross plus because for about 9 months
we were taxiing 2-3000 over gross because no one had actually sat down
and updated the weight and balance after various mods and load
additions. One of the benefits? of SACumsized maintenance was that Wing
QC was responsible for all that W&B paperwork and not the squadrons. As
if we worried about it, anyway, at least not until the CBU38 mine
dispensers were loaded on the inboard TERs and the first crew aborted
because the beast wouldn't rotate at 195 KIAS. FWIW our usual load was
CL bag, MERs with 12xMk82, TERs with a jammer, 2xAIM7, 2xAIM9.
Did fly about 2 dozen CAS missions with 18xMk82s.
Walt BJ

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.