A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dear Fellow Sailplane Racers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #32  
Old October 7th 05, 08:31 AM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greg Arnold wrote:

Does anyone know of any examples of any successful soaring-related
lawsuits? Their scarcity suggests that liability probably isn't a big
problem.


Statistics doesn't work on small numbers. It only takes one reckless
attorney finding one desperate relative and just one crazy jury honoring
an eorbitant claim to ruin a whole enterprize.

Stefan
  #33  
Old October 7th 05, 05:52 PM
Paul M. Cordell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stefan wrote:
Greg Arnold wrote:

Does anyone know of any examples of any successful soaring-related
lawsuits? Their scarcity suggests that liability probably isn't a big
problem.



Statistics doesn't work on small numbers. It only takes one reckless
attorney finding one desperate relative and just one crazy jury honoring
an eorbitant claim to ruin a whole enterprize.

Stefan


Applebay Aviation producer of the Zuni sailplane was forced into
bankruptcy after a law suit was filed against it. The Law suit was
filed by the estate of a Zuni owner/pilot that was killed in a Zuni
Sailplane. The extensive accident investigation ascertained that the
structural failure was clearly caused by pilot error.
  #34  
Old October 7th 05, 06:31 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'll bet the entry price
could be $100 or less for ultralights, and certainly less than $1000
for a top end model with color display.

Maybe someone with a bit more electrical knowledge than I have could
marry a cell phone (they all now have GPS chips in them), a PDA,
something like pumped up Blue Tooth or 802.11g, and some Shareware
software to get this done? Some of the new PDAs might be able to get
the job done with nothing more than the software? See:

http://web.palm.com/products/smartph...50/index.jhtml

If it's not actually attached to the plane the FAA can't have too much
to say about it........and if you can piece the system together from
"off the shelf" hardware the lawyers will probably have a hard time as
well.

Of course an Open Source soultion like this may be hard to impliment
here in the US since there isn't much profit involved :-(
================
Leon McAtee
I know someone is going to say cell phones are not legal in planes here
in the US..............but that's another subject.

  #35  
Old October 7th 05, 07:06 PM
Bear
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This would be called "ADS-B". See:

http://adsb.tc.faa.gov/ADS-B.htm
http://www.ads-b.com/


FLARM is more than ADS-B!
It also warns when approaching static obstacles. That is the main reason
why REGA (Swiss Air-Rescue) installed FLARM in their helicopters.
  #36  
Old October 7th 05, 08:45 PM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Greg:
Does anyone know of any examples of any successful soaring-related
lawsuits? Their scarcity suggests that liability probably isn't a
big problem.


Stefan:
Statistics doesn't work on small numbers. It only takes one reckless
attorney finding one desperate relative and just one crazy jury
honoring an eorbitant claim to ruin a whole enterprize.


Paul
Applebay Aviation producer of the Zuni sailplane was forced into
bankruptcy after a law suit was filed against it. The Law suit was
filed by the estate of a Zuni owner/pilot that was killed in a Zuni
Sailplane. The extensive accident investigation ascertained that the
structural failure was clearly caused by pilot error.


Setting up a company to make FLARM style units available in the US
should be a lot easier and less risky than sailplane production,
especially if the design can be obtained from FLARM. Production of the
units can be done by fabrication companies here or abroad, so the
"USLARM" entity would only manage the promotion and sales of the units.
The assets of the company would be small, making them unattractive to
sue and little lost if they were sued.

With several companies (Monroy, Surecheck, Proxalert) selling
transponder detectors without going bankrupt from law suits, it seems
there is precedent for selling warning devices without fear of financial
ruin. Maybe it's because proving the transponder detector was the cause
of an accident is really difficult? Or maybe since we are supposed to
fly VFR using "see and avoid", the performance of a warning device is
completely irrelevant?

So, with a low start-up cost and a very small liability risk, is all we
need are some champions to "just do it"?

--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA
  #37  
Old October 8th 05, 01:30 AM
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bear wrote:
This would be called "ADS-B". See:

http://adsb.tc.faa.gov/ADS-B.htm
http://www.ads-b.com/


FLARM is more than ADS-B!
It also warns when approaching static obstacles. That is the main reason
why REGA (Swiss Air-Rescue) installed FLARM in their helicopters.


No, you got it backwards, ADS-B is much more than FLARM. ADS-B has
always had provision for fixed transmitters for obstacle avoidance.
Ground stations have the capability to broadcast locations of known
obstacles using datalink capability, along with real-time weather data,
etc. Plus, ground stations will retransmit traffic data derived from
ATC radar, allowing ADS-B equipped aircraft to receive traffic warnings
for mode C/S transponder equipped aircraft.

That said, ADS-B is horribly over-designed, and the current units are
large, power-hungry, and expensive. Hopefully, this will not be true in
5 years or so...

Marc
  #38  
Old October 8th 05, 01:05 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Marc Ramsey wrote:

No, you got it backwards, ADS-B is much more than FLARM. ADS-B has
always had provision for fixed transmitters for obstacle avoidance.


Different design. FLARM contains an obstacle database. No ground
transmitters.

Stefan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dear Fellow Sailplane Racers g l i d e r s t u d Soaring 0 October 1st 05 07:48 AM
Duster Plans For Sale - BJ-1b fullsize sailplane plans WoodHawk Soaring 0 April 25th 05 04:37 AM
LAST CALL - Free Beer for Sailplane Racers!! Region 6 Contest Manager Soaring 3 June 7th 04 02:14 AM
Free Beer for Sailplane Racers - The Tradition Continues! Region 6 Contest Manager Soaring 1 May 28th 04 02:02 PM
Ultralight sailplane aerotow liability Caracole Soaring 18 April 1st 04 09:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.