![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rapoport wrote:
Refining capacity for gasoline has increased 3X over the period while no new refineries were built. The question is: Is that kind of growth sustainable? -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com ____________________ |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Hotze wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 23:36:05 GMT, Matt Whiting wrote: Yes, has anyone an example of a government run business or anything else for that matter that ever turned a profit? Davis Monthan Air Force Base with selling aircraft parts (hey, seems to be on topic) is the only US military facility making a profit (so I was told at a tour there) Yes, it is easy to make money when you don't have to buy what you are selling! Do you have a real example? Matt |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It will make fascinating reading, trying to discern the real reasons that
an oil company would close a badly needed oil refinery. Because meeting EPA regulations costs more than the refined products could ever pay back. Unless of course you charged what it really costs! That's the point. If they could, they would. And, besides -- calling what amounts to an artificial tax on all of us the "real cost" of oil is disingenuous, at best. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, right. We'd be SO much better off if we'd just instead allowed
ourselves to be "unregulated" into the unmitigated environmental disaster oil companies (and others, of course) would have created absent those regulations. And don't fool yourself -- this oil/gas price situation is a mess that could ultimately lead to a world-wide economic downturn. Yup, it sure could. But whatever happens, it will be a minor shadow of what could have occurred with long-term environmental destruction. I don't believe anyone here has argued in favor of unfettered industrial waste. For example, I'm as glad as anyone that my beloved Great Lakes are cleaner than they've been since the days of Marquette & Joliet. (Of course, I'm also cognizant of the fact that many of my classmates are currently unemployed because all of the heavy industry has been driven overseas or south of the border. To you, I suppose, that's just "collateral damage." To them, it's been a family catastrophe without end. ) The bottom line is this: If we've been unable to build new refineries because we made them a regulatory nightmare, it's time to ratchet the regulations back a notch or three. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
consider it an option anymore, it is SOP. GM was very instrumental in
removing mass transit capability in many of the US cities by promoting and basically giving away busses. Busses aren't "mass transit" anymore? In most parts of the U.S., they are the only practical alternative to driving. Despite this fact, they are failing, and/or require huge government support to survive. For example, here in Iowa City (and our sister city, Coralville) we spend something approaching $18 million annually on the bus system. That is enough to buy every single rider a pretty decent (better than the Mighty Grape) used car -- every year. In case you haven't noticed, "Mass transit" is something most Americans use only as a last resort -- and for very good reasons. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
so send them all to Iowa :-)
I know where there is a nice Inn... We have several Europeans staying with us this weekend. And a couple more who are with us for a few months, visiting the University. Nice folks -- but we tend to avoid discussing politics with them... :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose opined
In fact, the removal of onerous legislative barriers -- which is what this bill attempts (and fails, BTW) to do -- will once again allow the free market to prevail. The free market fails when costs can be passed on to others without recourse. Pollution passes costs on to others without recourse, sometimes permanently. "Onerous legislative barriers" are one way to ensure that this doesn't happen (as much). Quite true. But if no pollution is allowed, we'd be in real trouble. Even the smoke from a campfire is pollution. They are a Good Thing. -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:I592f.412202$x96.147537@attbi_s72... consider it an option anymore, it is SOP. GM was very instrumental in removing mass transit capability in many of the US cities by promoting and basically giving away busses. Busses aren't "mass transit" anymore? In most parts of the U.S., they are the only practical alternative to driving. Despite this fact, they are failing, and/or require huge government support to survive. For example, here in Iowa City (and our sister city, Coralville) we spend something approaching $18 million annually on the bus system. That is enough to buy every single rider a pretty decent (better than the Mighty Grape) used car -- every year. In case you haven't noticed, "Mass transit" is something most Americans use only as a last resort -- and for very good reasons. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Put the vehicles on rails, power them with electricity, and define the route. Amazing how folks will build along the route to take advantage of the easily available transportation. Oh wait, that was back in the 1800's.... The reason the busses need so much help is because they are not the best solution and begin to reflect the real cost of transportation. Think subways, trains, trolleys. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "LWG" wrote in message . .. I just *love* it when liberals tell us we have to be taxed, or taxed more, on a commodity "for our own good." Is it to cut consumption? Well, then *you* trade your SUV in for a bicycle, and we'll how that works for you. What SUV? Interesting how a conservative would bid for less conservation. Even the prez finally asked us to conserve, just a little, for the better good. How do you keep children from doing something bad? There has to be some sort of 'penalty. Generally folks don't do things on their own, they will simply imitate each other... |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:40:56 GMT, Jay Honeck wrote:
In case you haven't noticed, "Mass transit" is something most Americans use only as a last resort -- and for very good reasons. mostly because of the ego. it is the same here, too. (but using the bus here is not seen as being poor or something) #m -- Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gas Prices Coming Down | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 15 | September 10th 05 03:07 PM |
Our local fuel prices just went up again! | Peter R. | Piloting | 17 | May 28th 04 06:08 PM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Owning | 77 | February 22nd 04 12:02 AM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Piloting | 81 | February 22nd 04 12:02 AM |
Web site for fuel prices? | Frode Berg | Owning | 3 | July 11th 03 02:38 PM |