A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Version of Tasman Variometer Firmware Available



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 12th 05, 08:25 PM
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

What cracks me up about all this is that I did one simple note which has
prompted many, many more notes. Which is more annoying, the original note,
or the many negative notes afterward? I would guess that the ratio of
negative notes to my original post is 10 to 1. The negative posts impact
the readability of this newsgroup much more than the single post I did.

Now I'm sure there will be many negative posts knocking this note. I dare
you all to not post anything in response. I just dare you. But I guess
that would be impossible for those with strong opinions who feel the need to
post those opinions every time I make an informational posting to this
group. In case you haven't figured it out yet, the negative notes will not
change me from doing occasional informational/commercial notes. I do them
pretty rarely so the impact is extremely small. So fire away, but all you
are doing is impacting this newsgroup negatively to a greater extent than I
am.

I have a suggestion that I know you can't and won't follow - Ignore my rare
notes and don't post negative notes after them. I know, that would be
impossible to do. "But Paul, I must post negative comments about your
notes. I just can't help it. It's for the greater good... What you're
doing is wrong according to some obscure rule that most people don't care
about."

I guess we are all entitled to our opinions. You know mine and I know
yours. So let's stop messing up this newsgroup with them.

Oops... now I guess this note makes it a total of 2 notes from me on this
thread...

Paul Remde

"T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message
...
wrote:

all businesses in the Soaring Industry respect the charter of the RAS.
How would you like all commercial businesses associated with Soaring to
post on the RAS with the disclaimer that ?


Why limit it to soaring? There are lots of non-soaring
related businesses that would love to post. Or how about
those who sell diapers to glider pilots for those long
flights - the semi-related products?

The charter prohibits commercial posts - that's true of all
rec.* groups except those with charters that explicitly
permit them. The terms of service of all ISP's prohibit
such posts, or they are denied a Usenet feed.



T o d d P a t t i s t - "WH" Ventus C
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real World Specs for FS 2004 Paul H. Simulators 16 August 18th 03 09:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.