![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* Steven P. McNicoll :
It's the localizer, not a fix. Localizer identifiers are in the book, LLZ is not. You seem reluctant to identify this airport. Why? Because I had no specific airport in mind, really. It was a completely synthetic example. Yes, the point of interception does matter. Aircraft are to be vectored to intercept the localizer at a point no closer than three miles outside the FAF and at an altitude not above the glideslope or below the minimum glideslope intercept altitude specified on the IAP. At 4000 you seem a bit too high. Absolutely. But sometimes things don't go the way they should go, and my question was what to do then. Best regards, Daniel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
Required hold? | Nicholas Kliewer | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | November 14th 04 01:38 AM |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
IFR in the 1930's | Rich S. | Home Built | 43 | September 21st 03 01:03 AM |