![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, I sounds like you guys have put a lot more thought it to this than
I did. Currently I am a memeber of a club. I totally understand that a club, set to break even and with many volunter hours is much cheaper than a business that actually has to pay people let a lone make a profit. (my club was $1500 to buy in C172 aprox $65 hour with current fuel prices) I started thinking and I guess sport pilot planes aren't going to be any cheaper than a C152. The difference in fuel burn just dosen't make up for the fact that a new airplane means more debt / interest and insurance costs. I have yet to be proven that a rotex or jabiru is much cheaper to operate than a Lyc. I am still will to rent one from time to time if anyone ever decides to rent out one in the Seattle area. (feel free to email me if you know where a rental is) I still hope the sport pilots rule encourages for pilots. Of course how can anyone get a license in only 20 hours but that's another story. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
From the EAA site these are in WA. I don't have a clue where they are in comparison to you but what the heck! College Place, WA Allan Fisher509-529-9370 has a RANS S-12 , Enumclaw, Steve Fribley 206-234-1306 has a Taylorcraft BC-12, Spanaway, Ray Blatt, 253-847-4875, has a RANS -S9 and RANS S10, Seattle David Overman 253-241-9891, Sparrowhawk AutoGyro (now that'd be different!) Patrick student SP aircraft structural mech wrote in message ps.com... Wow, I sounds like you guys have put a lot more thought it to this than I did. Currently I am a memeber of a club. I totally understand that a club, set to break even and with many volunter hours is much cheaper than a business that actually has to pay people let a lone make a profit. (my club was $1500 to buy in C172 aprox $65 hour with current fuel prices) I started thinking and I guess sport pilot planes aren't going to be any cheaper than a C152. The difference in fuel burn just dosen't make up for the fact that a new airplane means more debt / interest and insurance costs. I have yet to be proven that a rotex or jabiru is much cheaper to operate than a Lyc. I am still will to rent one from time to time if anyone ever decides to rent out one in the Seattle area. (feel free to email me if you know where a rental is) I still hope the sport pilots rule encourages for pilots. Of course how can anyone get a license in only 20 hours but that's another story. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
Like the required minimum times for a Rec or a Private Pilot, it is just that ....the minimum. I worry about folks who think the goal should be the minimum. I focus on being a proficient pilot. How many hours that takes me, well it will just be how many hours it takes me! ![]() soon timewise. At around 20 duel, but still need cross country and solos. Lack of ability to fly a sport plane locally can add to the time as well. I started in Cherokee/Warrior , 8.5 in those, and then started on taildraggers ..and it really was alot like starting over. Add in there that I am also doing spin training, which most Private Pilots nowdays don't do I am told..and yep it is going to run me over the minimum hours. I want to be good, not a minimum ![]() I will finish up on the controlled airspace endorsement and the 87 knot endorsement too. I think doing all of that will make me a good rookie pilot! ![]() certificate to really learn. One thing is true..the sport pilot rule has alot of prices jacked up ! Old planes that you could hardly give away before are selling like hot cakes for a good chunk of change. And prices on new ones are jacked up as well. As for their rental..they are a sport plane, no matter how new and shiney....none are speed demons. They can only cruise at 120 knots no matter how slick it looks. It will not have the payload of most GA airplanes....it's a sport plane. I can rent an Archer for 100 bucks, a 172 for less than that. They are not new...but the old "sport planes" can be rented pretty dern cheap. 57 an hour last time due to a rise in gas cost. Good deal if you ask me! Let us this as a scenario for comparison. If you went to a car rental place and they had a 2000 Mustang GT for 100 a day, or a Focus for 100 a day......which would be rented? Right , you can bet your sweet bippy the Focus is staying parked. Now put sport plane(plane by hour of course) in there instead of Focus. Still is going to stay parked more than any other one. Lower the rate of the Focus or sport plane to 60 and by golly it's a miracle ,there is a demand. I think new sport planes are going to have to accept the fact that they are a sport plane always will be! For a salesman to compare a sport plane to normal new GA is IMHO ridiculas. No matter if you put a glass panel in it or not..it still has the same cruise , the same gross weight and all the other limitations. I'll be the first to admit alot of folks (especially if they have money to burn) would have to fly anything with the latest "Gizmo" in it. But that group is not what is going to make or break sport pilot. Normal everyday folks wanting to fly as cheap as possible will. You have to get them in there..130 bucks an hour is not going to do that. Make that rental so it even attracts regular PP's and wow look at how much your plane is getting rented out. I don't know of many PP's that would rent a sport plane for what they could rent a 25 year old faster plane for especially if they wanted to actually go on alittle trip. Right now there is a difference as to what is cost effective to FBO/owner and the consumer. We all know if the consumer does not see it as cost effective they won't do it. No consumer, another aviation biz bites the dust. Patrick student SP aircraft structural mech wrote in message ps.com... .. Of course how can anyone get a license in only 20 hours but that's another story. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:26:07 -0400, "W P Dixon"
wrote: There are places out there, There's a list of Cub-friendly airports (and Cub instruction) at www.pipercubforum.com/friendly.htm I'd be glad of any additions. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sport Pilot inconsistency | frustrated flier | Piloting | 19 | September 10th 04 04:53 PM |
FAA has temporarily withdrawn the proposed Sport Pilot rule | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 2 | March 27th 04 06:23 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |