![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:05:03 -0700, "Seth Masia"
wrote: I can't conceive of an operational situation that would cause a steel cord to come adrift from inside the molded rubber. I can. I was an auto mechanic for 9 years. Tires that had steel reinforced tread could and did expose them if the tires were run at low pressure for too long. Happened all the time. Don't see why airplane tires wouldn't become damaged in the same manner if run with low pressure. The tire pressure for a Cessna 172S is 35 psi mains and 43 psi front according to the POH. Last time I flew the rental, which was during my biennial flight review a few weeks ago, I noticed the front tire was low. The instructor had a pressure guage with him and admonished me to keep one with me at all times myself. We found the front tire was at 8 psi and both mains were around 10. According to the CFI, land a bit cockeyed with tire pressures that low and you could easily blow out a tire. Corky Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... I can. I was an auto mechanic for 9 years. Tires that had steel reinforced tread could and did expose them if the tires were run at low pressure for too long. Happened all the time. Don't see why airplane tires wouldn't become damaged in the same manner if run with low pressure. One main reason might be the duration of operation required to cause a problem. Airplane tires do warm up, but not nearly to the extent that an automobile tire would. They simply aren't used for the distances and speeds that an auto tire experiences. The heat that is the cause of failure at low tire pressures is much less likely to become a factor for an airplane tire than for auto tires. [...] According to the CFI, land a bit cockeyed with tire pressures that low and you could easily blow out a tire. I can believe that the tire would separate from the rim, allowing the tire pressure to be completely relieved. Technically, that would be a "blow out" IMHO, but it's not the same as a failure of the actual tire material. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually what is more common with low tire pressure is that on landing the
rubber tire "slips" on the rim during spin up.. putting pressure on the valve stem and cutting it or wearing a hole near the valve stem. BT According to the CFI, land a bit cockeyed with tire pressures that low and you could easily blow out a tire. I can believe that the tire would separate from the rim, allowing the tire pressure to be completely relieved. Technically, that would be a "blow out" IMHO, but it's not the same as a failure of the actual tire material. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BTIZ" wrote in message news:MfG3f.5812$MN6.547@fed1read04... Actually what is more common with low tire pressure is that on landing the rubber tire "slips" on the rim during spin up.. putting pressure on the valve stem and cutting it or wearing a hole near the valve stem. BT That has been a problem with tube type tires since the days of the Model T. It is mostly forgotten nowadays. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:21:20 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote: wrote in message .. . I can. I was an auto mechanic for 9 years. Tires that had steel reinforced tread could and did expose them if the tires were run at low pressure for too long. Happened all the time. Don't see why airplane tires wouldn't become damaged in the same manner if run with low pressure. One main reason might be the duration of operation required to cause a problem. Airplane tires do warm up, but not nearly to the extent that an automobile tire would. They simply aren't used for the distances and speeds that an auto tire experiences. The heat that is the cause of failure at low tire pressures is much less likely to become a factor for an airplane tire than for auto tires. You are coming up with reasonable conjectures as to why steel threads might not work through the sidewall. The problem is the threads DID work their way through the sidewall. Rolling them at low pressure would flex the sidewalls more than they are designed for. Corky Scott |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... You are coming up with reasonable conjectures as to why steel threads might not work through the sidewall. The problem is the threads DID work their way through the sidewall. My point is simply that absent a manufacturing defect, the usual mode of failure due to low tire pressure doesn't apply. Rolling them at low pressure would flex the sidewalls more than they are designed for. But assuming no manufacturing defect, would not result in tire failure. Pete |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blanik tire problem | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 5 | September 30th 05 06:02 PM |
Tire question | Jay Honeck | Owning | 30 | February 8th 05 07:55 PM |
Flat Spin | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 34 | February 10th 04 05:57 PM |
Tire Stiffness & trailer swaying - resolution | chris | Soaring | 6 | October 26th 03 03:50 PM |
Tire Stiffness & trailer swaying | chris | Soaring | 42 | October 22nd 03 03:51 AM |