![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "GeorgeB" wrote in message ... Ah, because the REAL rounding rule, designed so that averages will not become distorted high from rounding 1/2 up, is to round 1/2 to the EVEN number. If these runways were at the same field, your method would have runway designators that differ by twenty degrees for runways that have a difference in azimuth of only ten degrees. I think I'd round both in the direction that local magnetic variation was moving. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True or false: An airplane can be a Piper or a Cessna.
While it is also true that an airplane could also be a Mooney or a Beechcraft or any of the thousands of other builders that have come and gone, the statement: "An airplane can be a Piper or a Cessna", is quite true, although quite possibly less than necessarily inclusive. Hence my choice of the absolutely true statement: "The magnetic heading of Runway 5 can be any heading between 046 and 054." I recognize that Runway 5 MIGHT also have a magnetic heading of 045 or 055. But if it has a heading between 046 and 054, it WILL ABSOLUTELY be Runway 5. My choice to use "between 046 and 054" instead of including 045 or 055 was in the, obviously vain, hope that we could avoid the endless argument over minutiae that all too often clogs this group... "Mike W." wrote in message ... No, Bill has this right. If rounded correctly, 045 becomes 'runway 4' and 055 becomes 'runway 6'. "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Lakeview Bill" wrote No... The magnetic heading of Runway 5 can be any heading between 046 and 054. Actually, it could be 045 to 055. There is a choice of rounding up or down, with a heading ending in "5". -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lakeview Bill" wrote in message . .. "The magnetic heading of Runway 5 can be any heading between 046 and 054." I recognize that Runway 5 MIGHT also have a magnetic heading of 045 or 055. But if it has a heading between 046 and 054, it WILL ABSOLUTELY be Runway 5. KMKE had a runway some years ago with a magnetic azimuth of 053. It was designated Runway 7L. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Lakeview Bill" wrote in message . .. "The magnetic heading of Runway 5 can be any heading between 046 and 054." I recognize that Runway 5 MIGHT also have a magnetic heading of 045 or 055. But if it has a heading between 046 and 054, it WILL ABSOLUTELY be Runway 5. KMKE had a runway some years ago with a magnetic azimuth of 053. It was designated Runway 7L. SJC's runway 29 is 303.3 degrees. Hilton |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hilton" wrote in message nk.net... SJC's runway 29 is 303.3 degrees. ATW's runway 29 is 297.9 degrees. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilots | Slick | Piloting | 4 | November 20th 04 11:21 AM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Owning | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |