A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Runway ID



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 16th 05, 05:32 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway ID


"GeorgeB" wrote in message
...

Ah, because the REAL rounding rule, designed so that averages will not
become distorted high from rounding 1/2 up, is to round 1/2 to the
EVEN number.


If these runways were at the same field, your method would have runway
designators that differ by twenty degrees for runways that have a difference
in azimuth of only ten degrees. I think I'd round both in the direction
that local magnetic variation was moving.


  #2  
Old October 16th 05, 01:00 PM
Lakeview Bill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway ID

True or false: An airplane can be a Piper or a Cessna.

While it is also true that an airplane could also be a Mooney or a
Beechcraft or any of the thousands of other builders that have come and
gone, the statement: "An airplane can be a Piper or a Cessna", is quite
true, although quite possibly less than necessarily inclusive.

Hence my choice of the absolutely true statement:

"The magnetic heading of Runway 5 can be any heading between 046 and 054."

I recognize that Runway 5 MIGHT also have a magnetic heading of 045 or 055.
But if it has a heading between 046 and 054, it WILL ABSOLUTELY be Runway 5.

My choice to use "between 046 and 054" instead of including 045 or 055 was
in the, obviously vain, hope that we could avoid the endless argument over
minutiae that all too often clogs this group...



"Mike W." wrote in message
...
No, Bill has this right. If rounded correctly, 045 becomes 'runway 4' and
055 becomes 'runway 6'.
"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Lakeview Bill" wrote No...

The magnetic heading of Runway 5 can be any heading between 046 and

054.

Actually, it could be 045 to 055. There is a choice of rounding up or

down,
with a heading ending in "5".
--
Jim in NC





  #3  
Old October 16th 05, 02:06 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway ID


"Lakeview Bill" wrote in message
. ..

"The magnetic heading of Runway 5 can be any heading between 046 and 054."

I recognize that Runway 5 MIGHT also have a magnetic heading of 045 or
055.
But if it has a heading between 046 and 054, it WILL ABSOLUTELY be Runway
5.


KMKE had a runway some years ago with a magnetic azimuth of 053. It was
designated Runway 7L.


  #4  
Old October 16th 05, 02:27 PM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway ID

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Lakeview Bill" wrote in message
. ..

"The magnetic heading of Runway 5 can be any heading between 046 and
054."

I recognize that Runway 5 MIGHT also have a magnetic heading of 045 or
055.
But if it has a heading between 046 and 054, it WILL ABSOLUTELY be Runway
5.


KMKE had a runway some years ago with a magnetic azimuth of 053. It was
designated Runway 7L.


SJC's runway 29 is 303.3 degrees.

Hilton


  #5  
Old October 16th 05, 02:37 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway ID


"Hilton" wrote in message
nk.net...

SJC's runway 29 is 303.3 degrees.


ATW's runway 29 is 297.9 degrees.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pilots Slick Piloting 4 November 20th 04 11:21 AM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Owning 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Piloting 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Rwy incursions Hankal Piloting 10 November 16th 03 02:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.