![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... I found it. Quoted in earlier post by Bob Moo ____________________________________ 4-3-6. Use of Runways/Declared Distances a. Runways are identified by numbers which indicate the nearest 10-degree increment of the azimuth of the runway centerline. For example, where the magnetic azimuth is 183 degrees, the runway designation would be 18; for a magnetic azimuth of 87 degrees, the runway designation would be 9. For a magnetic azimuth ending in the number 5, such as 185, the runway designation could be either 18 or 19. Wind direction issued by the tower is also magnetic and wind velocity is in knots. ____________________________________ So if this was a valid quote that Bob pulled up, it would seem to put *that* to rest. As far as the zero in the runway, I know it is not "correct" in the US, but I think it is a shame that we do not follow more of the IACO conventions. Just my opinion, of course. Advisory Circular 150/5340-1J STANDARDS FOR AIRPORT MARKINGS MARKINGS FOR PAVED RUNWAYS AND TAXIWAYS. Section 2. Runway Markings. 7. RUNWAY DESIGNATION MARKING. a. Purpose. A runway designation marking identifies a runway by its magnetic azimuth. b. Location. Runway designation markings, as shown in Figures 1 and 2, are located on each end of a runway. c. Color. Runway designation markings are white. It is particularly helpful to pilots if these markings are outlined in black on light colored pavements (see paragraph 4(a)(1)). d. Characteristics. A runway designation marking consists of a number and, on parallel runways, is supplemented with a letter. A single-digit runway designation number is not preceded by a zero. On a single runway, dual parallel runways and triple parallel runways, the designation number is the whole number nearest one-tenth of the magnetic azimuth when viewed from the direction of approach. For example, where the magnetic azimuth is 183 degrees, the runway designation marking would be 18; and for a magnetic azimuth of 87 degrees, the runway designation marking would be 9. For a magnetic azimuth ending in the number "5," such as 185 degrees, the runway designation marking can be either 18 or 19. On four or more parallel runways, one set of adjacent runways is numbered to the nearest one-tenth of the magnetic azimuth and the other set of adjacent runways is numbered to the next nearest one-tenth of the magnetic azimuth. (1) Parallel Runways. In the case of parallel runways, each runway designation number is supplemented by a letter, in the order shown from left to right when viewed from the direction of approach, as shown in the following examples: (i) For two parallel runways having a magnetic azimuth of 182 degrees, the runways would be designated "18L," "18R." (ii) For three parallel runways having a magnetic azimuth of 87 degrees, the runways would be designated "9L," "9C," "9R." (iii) For four parallel runways having a magnetic azimuth of 324 degrees, the runways would be designated "32L," "32R," "33L," "33R." (iv) For five parallel runways having a magnetic azimuth of 138 degrees, the runways would be designated "13L," "13R," "14L," "14C," "14R." (v) For six parallel runways having a magnetic azimuth of 83 degrees, the runways would be designated "8L," "8C," "8R," "9L," "9C," "9R." (vi) For seven parallel runways having a magnetic azimuth of 85 degrees, the runways would be designated "8L," "8C," "8R," "9L," "9C," "9R," "10." (2) There are some cases where parallel runway designation may not be appropriate because of possible pilot confusion with the runway surface or the distance between landing thresholds. For example a turf runway or a visual runway, which is parallel to a higher precedence runway and has a distance between the landing thresholds may have a different runway designation, especially if the paved runway has a paved parallel taxiway. Another example where a parallel runway designation may not be appropriate is a situation where the parallel runways are separated by a large distance with a terminal between them. (3) The size and spacing of the numbers and letters are reduced only when necessary due to space limitations on narrow runways, and should be no closer than 2 feet from the runway edge or side strips if present. The numbers and letters are in the form and proportion shown in Figure 4. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilots | Slick | Piloting | 4 | November 20th 04 11:21 AM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Owning | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |