![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"GeorgeB" wrote in message
... Jose, you are with the majority, and you are with what it being taught in today's schools until higher level mathematics. The round (exactly) half to the even is correct. George, you're right that rounding is often performed as you say (i.e., exactly half rounds to the nearest even integer), for the reason you say (to avoid statistical biasing). But I'd quibble about calling that "the" correct way. The function round(x) can be defined in various standard ways, and different ways can be more useful for different purposes, but there's no sense in which one conventional definition is the unique correct one. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Nearest...rFunction.html --Gary |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:03:57 -0400, "Gary Drescher"
wrote: "GeorgeB" wrote in message .. . Jose, you are with the majority, and you are with what it being taught in today's schools until higher level mathematics. The round (exactly) half to the even is correct. George, you're right that rounding is often performed as you say (i.e., exactly half rounds to the nearest even integer), for the reason you say (to avoid statistical biasing). But I'd quibble about calling that "the" correct way. The function round(x) can be defined in various standard ways, and different ways can be more useful for different purposes, but there's no sense in which one conventional definition is the unique correct one. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Nearest...rFunction.html That, and Mathematica, were what I was going to reference; however, you are correct that I had my head up that smelly place to consider it to be "the" correct way. I've it even further up that smelly place to get off on this when the question was on naming runways based on their magnetic heading ... which is not a constant thing in the short or long term, so what to do with a 5 is absolutely not going to be based on EXACTLY anything. Thanks for saying it so well. George |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilots | Slick | Piloting | 4 | November 20th 04 11:21 AM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Owning | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |