![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
Well since the max weight or CG doesn't change (unless you're doing a major modfication), just the empty weight, the equipment list with a ne emtpy weight/moment would seem not to need to duplicate that information. That's the conclusion to which I've been coming. I'd be more comfortable, though, if I found something (ie. in part 43) which discussed what to do when the maximum gross weight is altered. Since two of our club aircraft have had such upgrades, it would just be more clear to me if I could see the distinction drawn between modifications that do and do not alter gross weight. I'd also have liked to see some mechanism whereby a line was drawn for those modifications which might or might not impact gross weight. Yes, it should be obvious. But that uses common sense, and I fear the outcome should I make the mistake of applying common sense to legal (esp. FAA {8^) matters. - Andrew |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:54:02 -0400, Andrew Gideon
wrote: Ron Natalie wrote: Well since the max weight or CG doesn't change (unless you're doing a major modfication), just the empty weight, the equipment list with a ne emtpy weight/moment would seem not to need to duplicate that information. That's the conclusion to which I've been coming. I'd be more comfortable, though, if I found something (ie. in part 43) which discussed what to do when the maximum gross weight is altered. Since two of our club aircraft have had such upgrades, it would just be more clear to me if I could see the distinction drawn between modifications that do and do not alter gross weight. What does the STC say? (I think they are available on line if you could post the info regarding the STC). I'd also have liked to see some mechanism whereby a line was drawn for those modifications which might or might not impact gross weight. Yes, it should be obvious. But that uses common sense, and I fear the outcome should I make the mistake of applying common sense to legal (esp. FAA {8^) matters. - Andrew Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
What does the STC say?Â*Â*(IÂ*thinkÂ*theyÂ*areÂ*availableÂ*onÂ*line *ifÂ*youÂ*could post the info regarding the STC). I thought of that, and I tried to locate it. I could not. It is: sa703gl. I did locate plenty of planes that had this done, though, which was fun. I found a couple of NTSB reports regarding aircraft that had had this done, which was less fun. - Andrew |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:19:08 -0400, Andrew Gideon
wrote: Ron Rosenfeld wrote: What does the STC say?**(I*think*they*are*available*on*line*if*you*c ould post the info regarding the STC). I thought of that, and I tried to locate it. I could not. It is: sa703gl. I did locate plenty of planes that had this done, though, which was fun. I found a couple of NTSB reports regarding aircraft that had had this done, which was less fun. - Andrew That modification includes "• STC Paperwork Package with Gross Weight Increase and all FAA Approved Drawings, Instructions, Flight Manual Revisions, etc." I will bet that in there, possible in the AFM revisions, is the "legal" entry of the gross weight increase. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
That modification includes "• STC Paperwork Package with Gross Weight Increase and all FAA Approved Drawings, Instructions, Flight Manual Revisions, etc." Where did you locate this? - Andrew |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:56:58 -0400, Andrew Gideon
wrote: Ron Rosenfeld wrote: That modification includes "? STC Paperwork Package with Gross Weight Increase and all FAA Approved Drawings, Instructions, Flight Manual Revisions, etc." Where did you locate this? - Andrew http://www.pennyanaero.com/pdfs/superhawk.pdf I looked up the STC at the FAA web site and discovered that, although they did not have a copy of it, it was owned by Penn Yan. I went to the Penn Yan website, and that comment is in the advertising information for the STC. I could not locate the actual STC, though. However, it should be with the paperwork for the aircraft, and the appropriate AFM changes should have been made. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
I went to the Penn Yan website, and that comment is in the advertising information for the STC. I could not locate the actual STC, though. However, it should be with the paperwork for the aircraft, and the appropriate AFM changes should have been made. Thanks! - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gross Weight | Fred Choate | Piloting | 153 | July 14th 05 12:19 AM |
Max gross weight | Chris | Piloting | 21 | October 5th 04 08:22 PM |
Apache Alternate Gross Weight | Jim Burns | Owning | 1 | July 6th 04 05:15 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
F35 cost goes up. | Pat Carpenter | Military Aviation | 116 | April 11th 04 07:32 PM |