![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim
Thanks for the interesting statistics that compare GA favorably to other "recreational" type modes of transport. I'd be interested to see a comparison with horse riding, which I suspect has actually got a pretty bad accident rate, although not many people would think of it that way. And, although I've not been posting to this group long, I've learned enouigh already to observe that you have no hope of elucidating any kind of "reasonable debate" from Skylune. Jim Logajan wrote: "Skylune" wrote: Statistically, GA is the most dangerous of all forms of transportation. There is no (reasonable) debate on this point. Reasonable debate!? You obviously haven't seen _any_ debate, reasonable or otherwise, to spout such sweeping and easily refuted nonsense. According to cross modal studies in the U.S.[1] _and_ Australia[2], motorcycling is, by distance traveled measures, more dangerous than GA: In the U.S. in 2000, according to reference 1, there were ~27 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles for motorcyclists. In that same year there were ~2 fatalities per 100,000 hours flown for GA. Assuming a modest average airspeed of ~100 mph and only 1 person in each aircraft, that works out to ~20 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles for aircraft. In Australia in 1999, one study (table 3 in reference 2) showed there were ~17.5 fatalities per 100 million vehicle kilometers for motorcyclists. In that same year there were ~8.5 fatalities per 100 million vehicle kilometers for aircraft. In fact the Australian study shows motorcycling to be more hazardous than GA by several common measures. What is fascinating about the Australian study are some of the normalized numbers in Appendix A showing that even bicyclists and pedestrians are are greater risk by some measures than GA flyers: Table 5: Fatalities/100,000 vehicle hours travelled ------------------------------------------ Bicyclists 5.27 General Aviation (fixed wing) 5.15 Fatalities/100 million passenger kilometres ------------------------------------------ Pedestrians 15.36 General Aviation (fixed wing) 6.22 Is it safe? Depends on your risk threshold. If you are willing to risk walking across a road, you should have no qualms about taking a general aviation flight. [1] "Fatality Rates for Selected Modes" http://www.bts.gov/publications/tran...re_01_145.html [2] "Cross Modal Safety Comparisons" http://www.atsb.gov.au/aviation/rese...ross_modal.cfm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When motorcyclists and private pilots (and bicycle riders too) decide to
conjugate pleasure with necessity, and use their vehicle to get where they're going, they impose "get there" pressures that increase risk. They ride or fly in conditions that would normally have kept them grounded. Which is why business flying (not the kind with a professional crew, but the kind where someone flies himself to a meeting or some such) is so much more dangerous than private, recreational flying. There's only one problem with this statement - the statistics (google Nall Report) show exactly the opposite is true. Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Farris" wrote Ah, but there's method to his madness. He's (skylune) there to irk private pilots, and knows enough about the subject to do so. It must be fun for him, sitting back and watching knees jerk! Exactly! I have quit playing his game, and no longer read any of his posts. If everyone did that, he would go away. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Stuart" wrote And, although I've not been posting to this group long, I've learned enouigh already to observe that you have no hope of elucidating any kind of "reasonable debate" from Skylune. He's only here to push buttons and further his own agenda. You can bet that some of the postings from this group will be used in town meetings as evidence of how dangerous that airport that is near his house is so he can gain ground to shut it down. All this just because he thinks his rights supercede the rights of anyone else. The only way to get rid of this moron is to stop validating his posts by responding to them. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BDS" wrote in message
.. . "Paul Stuart" wrote And, although I've not been posting to this group long, I've learned enouigh already to observe that you have no hope of elucidating any kind of "reasonable debate" from Skylune. He's only here to push buttons and further his own agenda. You can bet that some of the postings from this group will be used in town meetings as evidence of how dangerous that airport that is near his house is so he can gain ground to shut it down. All this just because he thinks his rights supercede the rights of anyone else. The only way to get rid of this moron is to stop validating his posts by responding to them. To buy into this, you first have to believe that he/she is actually an adult property owner... Me, I'm not so sure... Jay Beckman PP-ASEL AZ Cloudbusters Chandler, AZ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Stuart" wrote in
ups.com: Jim Thanks for the interesting statistics that compare GA favorably to other "recreational" type modes of transport. I'd be interested to see a comparison with horse riding, which I suspect has actually got a pretty bad accident rate, although not many people would think of it that way. And, although I've not been posting to this group long, I've learned enouigh already to observe that you have no hope of elucidating any kind of "reasonable debate" from Skylune. HA! ANYONE who reffers to themselves in the third person should go directly to the kill file.... -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Stuart" wrote:
Thanks for the interesting statistics that compare GA favorably to other "recreational" type modes of transport. You're welcome. I'd be interested to see a comparison with horse riding, which I suspect has actually got a pretty bad accident rate, although not many people would think of it that way. I'd like to see numbers on recreational boating included. According to the ATSB, "The ATSB intends to update and augment this paper (eg to include marine and the results of comments on this paper) as future data becomes available." ( http://www.atsb.gov.au/road/statistics/cross_modal.aspx ) So maybe some day they'll include more transport modes. And, although I've not been posting to this group long, I've learned enouigh already to observe that you have no hope of elucidating any kind of "reasonable debate" from Skylune. My intent of posting was to bring what I thought was fascinating information to newsgroup readers - debating Skylune was accidental. When Skylune posted his assertion, I was actually expecting to find out he was correct - the notion that GA is more dangerous than automobile and commercial airline travel is well known. But I had a hunch that recreational boating might be almost as dangerous as GA, so I went searching for that. Haven't found any stats on boating, but did stumble across the motorcycling angle and went looking for that and eventually found the cross modal studies. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|