A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Verification that Heated Pitot is working



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 19th 05, 10:49 PM
Richard Isakson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Verification that Heated Pitot is working

"Dave S" wrote ...
Why would you have a heated pitot on a Cessna 172 or a piper arrow then?
Neither of THEM are certified for entry into known icing conditions, but
its nice to have the ability to safely fly OUT of them if you get INTO

them.

Dave,

A 172 can take a bit of icing and get away with it. Trust me and please
don't ask any questions I won't answer. In selecting a canard type
aircraft, the owner has to realize that there are some huge differences in
the way the horizontal controls react to airflow disturbances. In the case
of icing, he needs to take extreme measures to avoid those conditions. Even
if that means grounding the airplane for an extended period. That's what he
bought into when he got the airplane.

Having said that, if anyone knows of a canard icing study that says
differently please point me to it.

Rich


  #2  
Old October 20th 05, 05:22 AM
Marc J. Zeitlin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Verification that Heated Pitot is working

Richard Isakson wrote:

Having said that, if anyone knows of a canard icing study that says
differently please point me to it.


While I won't disagree with you that icing conditions are certainly to
be avoided in canard aircraft, probably more than in conventional
aircraft, I will say that I know two folks that have flown in icing
conditions, collected some ice on the canard, and had minor issues.

One of those people is me, during my instrument lessons near
Schenectady, NY in April of this year. I got about 1/16" - 1/8" of ice
on the canard, and my stall speed went up about 10 Kts. I flew around
under the clouds for one circle of the pattern, the ice melted, and we
landed. Of course, having the stall speed go up and not realizing it is
far less dangerous in a canard, since I can't stall the whole plane or
spin it - I noticed the speed difference because the nose started
bobbing at 90 mph in the downwind to base turn.

Another aquaintance with a COZY has had ice up to 1/8" - 1/4" on his
canard, and he says about the same thing.

That being said, I still agree that icing conditions are to be
strenuously avoided - 1/8" of ice is certainly not a lot, and I wouldn't
want to be experimenting with more.

--
Marc J. Zeitlin
http://www.cozybuilders.org/
Copyright (c) 2005


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force Working to Combat Stressors Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 18th 04 03:54 AM
Air Force Museum Working Group to release final report Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 18th 03 12:28 AM
Pitot heat Paul Mennen Owning 10 November 6th 03 09:54 AM
Pitot heat Paul Mennen Piloting 10 November 6th 03 09:54 AM
Chuck Yeager-pitot tube Ron Military Aviation 44 October 9th 03 03:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.