![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Oct 2005 20:47:6 -0500, "Ash Wyllie" wrote in
:: Larry Dighera opined I ran across this flight earlier. there is less here than meets the eye. During the day the pilots, all of whom are experienced RC glider pilots, used thermals so all the solar power collected could be used to charge the batteries for the night time. Where did you get that bit of information? If the aircraft had had to circle over the same spot, the flight would have been much shorter. Agreed, if atmospheric convective lift was indeed used to sustain the aircraft during daylight hours. While it's still solar power, but not photovoltaic, it would not be of practical use for sustaining the aircraft indefinitely. Solar cell efficiency and battery storage density need to at least double before true stay aloft forever is going to happen. How did you calculate that factor? Triple-Junction Gallium Arsenide solar cells with efficiencies of about 31% under terrestrial conditions are the most efficient of which I am awa http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/...r_030725s.html HIGH-EFFICIENCY SOLAR CELLS July 25, 2003 News Release A Spectrolab, Inc. associate places wafers on platters for epitaxial growth. The wafers are then fabricated into solar cells that will be capable of an unprecedented 36.9 percent efficiency in converting sunlight to energy when exposed to concentrated sunlight. Spectrolab, a Boeing subsidiary, uses these state-of-the-art photovoltaic solar cells in concentrator modules of various sizes and power-generating capabilities. Several modules are already being tested throughout the world by photovoltaic concentrator system manufacturers. These Spectrolab products could be part of terrestrial systems that dramatically reduce the cost of generating electricity from solar energy. Contact: Spectrolab, Inc. Public Relations Department P.O. Box 92919 (S10/S323) Los Angeles, CA 90009 Public Relations (310) 364-6363 www.boeing.com/satellite http://www.spectrolab.com/ Triple-Junction with a minimum average efficiency of 26.5%) developed and manufactured at Spectrolab. Ultra-Triple-Junction solar cells, with a minimum average efficiency of 28.3%, are now in production http://www.spectrolab.com/stores/ Spectrolab has a variety of solar cells in inventory and available in limited quantities. Some of these solar cells are rejects from the production line, others are surplus material from space programs. All are limited to small batches and sold on a first-come first-serve basis. Improved Triple-Junction Gallium Arsenide with efficiencies of about 26.8% (AM0) or about 31% under terrestrial conditions. Some of these solar cells are in excellent condition while others are functionally limited to a certain type of application. Call Mike Kalachian at (818) 898-7540 or send an e-mail to: Mike Kalachian to inquire about what is currently available. If you are ready to place an order, please download the appropriate form, fill it out appropriately and fax it to Mr. Kalachian's attention at: (818) 361-5102 The era of silent, zero emission flight is upon us. Never run out of fuel again. http://www.acpropulsion.com/whats_new.htm AC Propulsion SoLong UAV Flies for 48 Hours on Sunlight Two Nights Aloft Opens New Era of Sustainable Flight [...] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera opined
On 19 Oct 2005 20:47:6 -0500, "Ash Wyllie" wrote in :: Larry Dighera opined I ran across this flight earlier. there is less here than meets the eye. During the day the pilots, all of whom are experienced RC glider pilots, used thermals so all the solar power collected could be used to charge the batteries for the night time. Where did you get that bit of information? Aviation Wek and Space Technologies, IIRC. I probably didn't keep that issue. If the aircraft had had to circle over the same spot, the flight would have been much shorter. Agreed, if atmospheric convective lift was indeed used to sustain the aircraft during daylight hours. While it's still solar power, but not photovoltaic, it would not be of practical use for sustaining the aircraft indefinitely. Solar cell efficiency and battery storage density need to at least double before true stay aloft forever is going to happen. How did you calculate that factor? It was in the article. Triple-Junction Gallium Arsenide solar cells with efficiencies of about 31% under terrestrial conditions are the most efficient of which I am awa http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/...r_030725s.html HIGH-EFFICIENCY SOLAR CELLS July 25, 2003 News Release A Spectrolab, Inc. associate places wafers on platters for epitaxial growth. The wafers are then fabricated into solar cells that will be capable of an unprecedented 36.9 percent efficiency in converting sunlight to energy when exposed to concentrated sunlight. Spectrolab, a Boeing subsidiary, uses these state-of-the-art photovoltaic solar cells in concentrator modules of various sizes and power-generating capabilities. Several modules are already being tested throughout the world by photovoltaic concentrator system manufacturers. These Spectrolab products could be part of terrestrial systems that dramatically reduce the cost of generating electricity from solar energy. Contact: Spectrolab, Inc. Public Relations Department P.O. Box 92919 (S10/S323) Los Angeles, CA 90009 Public Relations (310) 364-6363 www.boeing.com/satellite http://www.spectrolab.com/ Triple-Junction with a minimum average efficiency of 26.5%) developed and manufactured at Spectrolab. Ultra-Triple-Junction solar cells, with a minimum average efficiency of 28.3%, are now in production http://www.spectrolab.com/stores/ Spectrolab has a variety of solar cells in inventory and available in limited quantities. Some of these solar cells are rejects from the production line, others are surplus material from space programs. All are limited to small batches and sold on a first-come first-serve basis. Improved Triple-Junction Gallium Arsenide with efficiencies of about 26.8% (AM0) or about 31% under terrestrial conditions. Some of these solar cells are in excellent condition while others are functionally limited to a certain type of application. Call Mike Kalachian at (818) 898-7540 or send an e-mail to: Mike Kalachian to inquire about what is currently available. If you are ready to place an order, please download the appropriate form, fill it out appropriately and fax it to Mr. Kalachian's attention at: (818) 361-5102 Weight and flexibility arealso important as well. It's not that the goal is impossible, just a little bit off. The era of silent, zero emission flight is upon us. Never run out of fuel again. http://www.acpropulsion.com/whats_new.htm AC Propulsion SoLong UAV Flies for 48 Hours on Sunlight Two Nights Aloft Opens New Era of Sustainable Flight [...] -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Oct 2005 15:46:26 -0500, "Ash Wyllie" wrote in
:: Larry Dighera opined On 19 Oct 2005 20:47:6 -0500, "Ash Wyllie" wrote in :: Larry Dighera opined I ran across this flight earlier. there is less here than meets the eye. During the day the pilots, all of whom are experienced RC glider pilots, used thermals so all the solar power collected could be used to charge the batteries for the night time. Where did you get that bit of information? Aviation Wek and Space Technologies, IIRC. I probably didn't keep that issue. Thanks for the pointer. There is a lot more information in that article: http://www.aviationweek.com/avnow/se...2F06275p01.xml SoLong Solar-Powered Drone Stays Aloft for 48 Hr. By Michael A. Dornheim 06/26/2005 03:05:12 PM PERPETUAL MOTION People have long dreamed of perpetual flight, and the tipping point was reached earlier this month when a solar-powered drone stayed aloft for 48 hr. It showed that enough energy could be stored during the day to fly the aircraft at night, for at least several days. All that's needed are small, near-term improvements in technology to tip this feat into flights lasting reliably for months. One application, albeit much harder, would be as a radio tower in the sky, giving line-of-sight access across a city. AC Propulsion, a small research company in San Dimas, Calif., made the flight after several years of dedicated effort by its founder, Alan G. Cocconi. Semi-perpetual flight has been sought after for years, most notably by AeroVironment and its solar-powered Helios drone with fuel cell storage (AW&ST Feb. 28, 2000, p. 58). More recently the company has been working on a pure fuel cell week-long flier (see p. 52). But AC Propulsion used lithium-ion laptop computer batteries for storage instead of fuel cells, as well as an overall simpler approach, to become the first to fly through two full nights under solar power (AW&ST Sept. 15, 2003, p. 66). It's a friendly rivalry, as Cocconi has been an important collaborator on several AeroVironment projects. The aircraft is called SoLong and is a powered sailplane of Cocconi's own design with solar cells built into the wing. It weighs 28.2 lb., has a 15.6-ft. span, and takes off with its own 1-hp. motor from a wheeled dolly. The control system includes a sophisticated autopilot with inertial, barometric and GPS references; a television camera gives an over-the-nose pilot's-eye view. It's easy to dismiss the project due to the small size of the aircraft and the 5 X 8-ft. ground station, but the flight system is equal to those many times larger. Still, Cocconi is quick to point out the limitations of the achievement. There was no mission flexibility. The six skilled glider pilots were focused only on soaring to keep the motor off most of the day in order to put more solar power into the battery. No payload was carried, though the TV camera is good for simple reconnaissance. A mostly cloud-free sky on a long summer day and reasonable weather were required. But the flight probably could have lasted a third night, and perhaps a fourth and a fifth. Cocconi landed after 48 hr. 16 min. because the pilots were exhausted, not because the battery was low on juice. The flight started at 4:08 p.m. PDT June 1 with a charged battery; two days later at that time, the charge was down less than 5%. The landing was made at 4:24 p.m. at the Desert Center airport operating base in southeastern California. SoLong is reasonably tough. It has been flown in 30-mph. winds and desert turbulence, and has landed at night with the aid of a pair of 1/2-watt LED "landing lights" in the wing and a set of $2 runway edge lights. The aircraft has flown more than 250 hr. in 60+ flights without being seriously damaged--not bad for a drone. AC Propulsion's multiday flight effort was self-funded and hence less ambitious than AeroVironment's, which was covered by multimillion-dollar contracts from NASA. Helios performance was challenging because it operated in the thin air at 50,000 ft., where more power is needed to loiter because of the high true airspeeds. The benefits of that altitude are that it is above the clouds and the winds are fairly low. Cocconi has an easier job loitering near sea level, though his drone has to be stronger to withstand the frequent turbulence there. Helios could carry some payload, and SoLong hasn't. Helios' regenerative fuel cells were a major headache, and AeroVironment and its contractors were not able to make them work. SoLong's battery has less energy per pound--but it works. Helios was destroyed in a crash in June 2003 (AW&ST Sept. 27, 2004, p. 59). Rather than trying to do everything at once, Cocconi decided to focus on the simplest path to multi-day flight, then build from there. He estimates he spent $20,000-30,000 developing SoLong during a two-year period, the majority of it full-time. Key parameters for endurance are the energy density of the batteries, the efficiency of the solar cells, and other efficiencies such as round-trip battery storage and motor economy at loiter thrust. These are on top of the usual parameters like lift-to-drag ratio, structural weight and propeller efficiency. Technology is improving in two key areas--the solar cells and the batteries. Cocconi made the first 24-hr. flight here with SoLong on Apr. 21-22, comprising two half-nights (AW&ST May 2, p. 19). The 100-cell, 800 watt-hr. battery was not quite big enough for a full night and could not absorb all the day's solar energy. It used LG Chem 18650-size lithium-ion laptop cells storing 185 watt-hr. per kilogram. In late May, Cocconi received Sanyo 18650 cells that could hold 214 watt-hr./kg., a 15% improvement. That, and increasing the battery to 120 cells, tipped performance to the current edge of being barely capable of multi-day flights. The pace of battery improvement has indeed been rapid. SoLong is now fitted with Sunpower A300 single-crystal silicon solar cells about 20% efficient. Each wing has a series string of 38 cells and they cover a total of about 13 sq. ft. producing a nominal 225 watts. They weigh about 2.3 lb. Bending the thin silicon cells to fit the wing contour is tricky and Cocconi has devised techniques to avoid breaking them. "It's like bending a 5-in. square of microscope slide glass," he says. Right now, 28% efficient space-grade cells are available, making 40% more power, but cost about 100 times as much. Covering the wing with them would cost about $150,000, Cocconi says. But that boost in power, along with the next generation of laptop batteries, would make SoLong a no-brainer multi-day airplane with no glider soaring required. Solar cell prices can only go down, and the reality of this craft is close. SoLong was recently modified to include a variable-pitch propeller, and inflight tuning has gained about 10% propeller efficiency. A load cell in the motor mounts, cannibalized from a postal scale, sends real-time thrust readings back to the ground. Pitch is automatically scheduled in flight but can be manually tweaked. The 23-in. prop folds back when not in use. An important factor is to maintain motor efficiency when operating at low loiter power settings. Maximum input is 800 watts for 1-hp. output, but minimum loiter is 95 watts. Cocconi built a special nine-phase motor controller that is 88% efficient at loiter power, including motor geartrain losses, instead of a typical 70-75%. The hollow wings are ribless with stiff sandwich skins to hold the airfoil shape. The solar cells are under the fiberglass outer skin. The fuselage is made of Kevlar and carbon-fiber composites. The lift-to-drag ratio is roughly 20, and the loiter speed is about 28 mph., or 2-3 mph. above stall speed. The autopilot can fly a constant lift coefficient to ease operating on the edge of stall. The ground station plots areas of rising and falling air from telemetry, giving a map to assist the pilots. On the first day, they were aggressively hand-flying to seek the best air; but when they tired on the second day, they would usually tell the autopilot to orbit a GPS waypoint at a defined radius in a good area. The second night was more turbulent and difficult than the first. An ingenious barometric roll sensor picks up static pressures near both wingtips and calculates the bank angle by measuring the flow due to differential pressure between the wingtips. Running the autopilot, flight controls, strobe lights and 5-mi.-range, 23-channel telemetry and TV transmitter takes only 7 watts. Cocconi would like to build a larger aircraft that can fly higher, but both those objectives would make the job more difficult and require bigger improvements in solar cell efficiency, battery energy density and lightweight structure. And that would make him face more of the problems that were tackled by Helios. Energy Budget Per Day (June 1-3 at 33.75 deg. N. Lat.) (estimated by Aviation Week & Space Technology) BATTERY CHARGING (approx. 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. 10 hr.) Solar power in 1.55 kw.-hr. used to charge battery 1.1-1.2 kw.-hr. used for housekeeping(7 watts X 10 hr.) 0.07 kw.-hr. used for motor (95 watts X ~4 hr.) 0.38 kw.-hr. BATTERY DISCHARGING (approx. 7 p.m. to 9 a.m. 14 hr.) Available in battery 1.2 kw.-hr. used for housekeeping (7 watts X 14 hr.) 0.1 kw.-hr. used for motor (95 watts X ~9.5-11.0 hr.) 0.9-1.05 kw.-hr. DIMENSIONS Wingspan 15.6 ft. Wing area 16.1 sq. ft. WEIGHTS Gross weight 28.2 lb. Battery 12.3 lb. Solar cells 2.3 lb. COMPONENTS Battery 120 Sanyo 18650 Li-Ion cells Battery capacity 1,200 watt-hr. Solar array 76 Sunpower A300 solar cells Nominal solar power 225 watts Powerplant Kontronik 800-watt electric PERFORMANCE Speed range 28-50 mph. Min. loiter power 95 watts Max. climb rate 490 fpm. (Battery power alone can climb to approx. 50,000 ft.) Control and telemetry range 5 mi. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Rotorcraft | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:17 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |