A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Engine failure



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 25th 05, 08:58 PM
The Visitor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Engine failure



RST Engineering wrote:

The OP said this was a 172.

Some are. So I have to ask.

Anyhow, if so it may be linked to a problem in the fuel pump. Mine was
actually missing a connecting spring (from factory) that did not allow
it to maintain a fuel flow at idle settings. So for years I go around
with it a bit high on the idle and sometimes on rollout, just at the end
and starting to turn off, the engine would shake and I would hit the
electric pump to bring it back. I actually had it down to a fine art.
The problem was only found when the pump was pulled and sent out to have
a seal changed.

John

  #2  
Old October 25th 05, 09:14 PM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Engine failure


"The Visitor" wrote in message
...


RST Engineering wrote:

The OP said this was a 172.

Some are. So I have to ask.



Without me having to go to the TCs and do a search, can somebody please tell
me what series of 172s were injected?



Anyhow, if so it may be linked to a problem in the fuel pump.



And again the models of 172s that have fuel pumps?


Jim


  #3  
Old October 25th 05, 09:29 PM
JohnK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Engine failure

All of the 172's at my FBO are FI, but they are all 1999 and newer.
Probably doesn't answer your question too well. Always gets me when I
go to pull on carb heat during a descent and it's not there.

John K.

  #4  
Old October 25th 05, 10:00 PM
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Engine failure

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:14:58 -0700, "RST Engineering"
wrote:


"The Visitor" wrote in message
...


RST Engineering wrote:

The OP said this was a 172.

Some are. So I have to ask.



Without me having to go to the TCs and do a search, can somebody please tell
me what series of 172s were injected?


I think it's any of the "new" ones - 1996 and newer R and S models.


Anyhow, if so it may be linked to a problem in the fuel pump.



And again the models of 172s that have fuel pumps?


1996 and newer - R and S models have electric fuel pumps, certain
serial numbers of which also have a SB out against it for something to
do with a diaphragm issue and inspection thereof if memory serves.
  #5  
Old October 25th 05, 10:42 PM
Allen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Engine failure


"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...

"The Visitor" wrote in message
...


RST Engineering wrote:

The OP said this was a 172.

Some are. So I have to ask.



Without me having to go to the TCs and do a search, can somebody please
tell me what series of 172s were injected?



Anyhow, if so it may be linked to a problem in the fuel pump.



And again the models of 172s that have fuel pumps?


Hawk XP is injected but it has a 195 hp Continental 10-360-K in it.

Allen


  #6  
Old October 26th 05, 02:43 PM
The Visitor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Engine failure

The newer 172's are fuel injected. They will have an engine driven fuel
pump and and electric one.

John








RST Engineering wrote:

"The Visitor" wrote in message
...


RST Engineering wrote:


The OP said this was a 172.


Some are. So I have to ask.




Without me having to go to the TCs and do a search, can somebody please tell
me what series of 172s were injected?



Anyhow, if so it may be linked to a problem in the fuel pump.




And again the models of 172s that have fuel pumps?


Jim



  #7  
Old October 27th 05, 10:53 AM
Tom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Engine failure

A lot of 0-300's in the older 172's have fuel pumps, I am not too sure why
though. Maybe because of the 6 cylinders?

Tom

"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...

"The Visitor" wrote in message
...


RST Engineering wrote:

The OP said this was a 172.

Some are. So I have to ask.



Without me having to go to the TCs and do a search, can somebody please
tell me what series of 172s were injected?



Anyhow, if so it may be linked to a problem in the fuel pump.



And again the models of 172s that have fuel pumps?


Jim



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Engine failure on takeoff Greg Copeland Piloting 0 May 11th 04 04:59 PM
In-Flight Engine Failure O. Sami Saydjari Owning 59 April 30th 04 08:40 AM
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts Eric D Rotorcraft 22 March 5th 04 06:11 AM
Engine failure rates poll Captain Wubba Piloting 3 December 8th 03 02:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.