|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
January 19th 04, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
In article . net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "Brad Z" wrote in message news:uAJOb.97275$xy6.175256@attbi_s02... In your scenario, the "hold for an hour" consideration is baloney. The reg's state that you should commence the approach as soon as possible to your "filed or amended (with ATC) estimated time en route." I would argue that if the controller is giving you vectors for the approach, he knows you're early. I would argue that this is essentually an ETA amendment for all practical purposes, and therefore in alignment with 91.185. Actually, it's unlikely the controller knows you're early as it's unlikely he knew your original ETA. Yeah, but the point is, he knows where you are now. 
|
|
#2
January 19th 04, 02:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roy Smith" wrote in message ... Yeah, but the point is, he knows where you are now. Yeah, but his argument is if the controller is giving you vectors for the approach, he knows you're early.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 195 | November 28th 05 10:06 PM |
| Lost comm altitude? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | January 11th 04 12:29 AM |
| Ham sandwich navigation and radar failure | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | December 31st 03 12:15 AM |
| Marine Radar in a plane? | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 31 | August 13th 03 06:56 PM |
Hybrid Mode
