A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lost comms after radar vector



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 19th 04, 07:43 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:OpWOb.100956$xy6.181890@attbi_s02...


Squawk 7700 briefly (15 seconds?) to get the attention of ATC, and to give
some notice of your intention to exercise your PIC emergency authority to "bend"
the regulations.


Not necessary. If squawking anything is working, 7600 will get their attention just
find. You don't need to give them any such notification.


Fly the approach, land, clear the runway, taxi to the FBO, call the tower.

If there's a tower, don't forget to look for the light.

  #2  
Old January 19th 04, 07:48 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

If there's a tower, don't forget to look for the light.


What will you do if there's no light?


  #3  
Old January 19th 04, 07:54 PM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

If there's a tower, don't forget to look for the light.


What will you do if there's no light?



Take off, hold at the FAF for an hour, land and check for the light
again. Repeat until you run out of fuel.
  #4  
Old January 24th 04, 03:10 AM
Randy at Home
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...
|
| "Ron Natalie" wrote in message
| m...
|
| If there's a tower, don't forget to look for the light.
|
|
| What will you do if there's no light?

If you're in IMC, a light is going to be a bit hard to see anyway (assuming
the tower knows where to point it). If you can see the light far enough in
advance to be meaningful, wouldn't you be in VMC - or close enough to it for
government work?


  #5  
Old January 24th 04, 03:15 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Randy at Home" wrote in
message able.rogers.com...

If you're in IMC, a light is going to be a bit hard to see anyway

(assuming
the tower knows where to point it).


It may be a bit hard to see the runway as well. But what will you do if you
don't see a light?



If you can see the light far enough in advance to be meaningful,
wouldn't you be in VMC - or close enough to it for government work?


Not necessarily. But what will you do if you don't see a light?


  #6  
Old January 24th 04, 03:53 AM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

It may be a bit hard to see the runway as well. But what will you do if you
don't see a light?


After shooting a NORDO approach in IMC, the only lights I'm looking for
are the approach lights and the runway lights. And maybe the one on the
back of the jeep illuminating the "Follow Me" sign.

If the guy in the tower wants to get his jollies shining a green light
at me, that's his problem, not mine.
  #7  
Old January 24th 04, 03:59 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...

After shooting a NORDO approach in IMC, the only lights I'm looking for
are the approach lights and the runway lights. And maybe the one on the
back of the jeep illuminating the "Follow Me" sign.

If the guy in the tower wants to get his jollies shining a green light
at me, that's his problem, not mine.


Easy, big fella. I'm not the one that said, "If there's a tower, don't
forget to look for the light." That was Ron Natalie. I wouldn't look for
landing clearance either. I was just curious what he would do if he saw no
light.


  #8  
Old January 24th 04, 04:22 AM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote...

I wouldn't look for
landing clearance either. I was just curious what he would do if he saw no
light.


I'd be looking for red lights... Green ones are good; but no lights means
everyone's asleep, gone home, or not concerned. Red ones mean trouble...

  #9  
Old January 19th 04, 08:05 PM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Natalie" wrote...

Squawk 7700 briefly (15 seconds?) to get the attention of ATC, and to

give
some notice of your intention to exercise your PIC emergency authority to

"bend"
the regulations.


Not necessary. If squawking anything is working, 7600 will get their

attention just
find. You don't need to give them any such notification.


I don't know the current state of the art of ATC radars. However, the 7700/7600
switch was a part of the Navy Instrument Flight Manual as late as 1994. The
rationale was that not all ATC radars had the same level of alerting for 7600
squawks as 7700, and/or that the alert might be manually disabled.

If all ATC radars now have the same level of alert for a 7600 squawk, then 7600
only makes sense.

  #10  
Old January 19th 04, 08:27 PM
David Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:_LWOb.84380$Rc4.305921@attbi_s54...
"Ron Natalie" wrote...

Squawk 7700 briefly (15 seconds?) to get the attention of ATC, and

to
give
some notice of your intention to exercise your PIC emergency authority

to
"bend"
the regulations.


Not necessary. If squawking anything is working, 7600 will get their

attention just
find. You don't need to give them any such notification.


I don't know the current state of the art of ATC radars. However, the

7700/7600
switch was a part of the Navy Instrument Flight Manual as late as 1994.

The
rationale was that not all ATC radars had the same level of alerting for

7600
squawks as 7700, and/or that the alert might be manually disabled.

If all ATC radars now have the same level of alert for a 7600 squawk, then

7600
only makes sense.


7700 for one minute, followed by 7600, is one of the "wrong" answers in two
questions on the IFR knowledge test, and I always assumed that was because
it is a known incorrect or obsolete practice. However, one of the questions
specifies "you do not exercise emergency authority", so isn't exactly
appropriate to the specified scenario.

-- David Brooks


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 195 November 28th 05 10:06 PM
Lost comm altitude? Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 12 January 11th 04 12:29 AM
Ham sandwich navigation and radar failure David Brooks Instrument Flight Rules 47 December 31st 03 12:15 AM
Marine Radar in a plane? Jay Honeck Home Built 31 August 13th 03 06:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.