![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary Drescher" wrote in
How long was it after the landing that he attempted to take off? Traumatic experiences, like an emergency landing, tend to screw up people's ability to think for a period afterward. The emergency landing was on Wednesday, and the attempted takeoff was Thursday afternoon. One less excuse then. FWIW, in Canada: The Ontario Highway Traffic Act says: When an aircraft has landed on a highway because of an emergency related to the operation of the aircraft, the aircraft may take off from the highway provided, (a) a commercial licensed pilot, not being the owner of the aircraft, who is qualified to fly that class and category of aircraft, and the pilot in command of the aircraft are both satisfied that the aircraft is airworthy and that there are no physical obstructions on or over the highway which would make such take-off unsafe; (b) the pilot in command of the aircraft is satisfied that weather conditions are satisfactory for the purpose and that the minimum requirements are met under the visual flight rules established by the regulations made under the Aeronautics Act (Canada) or, if the flight is to be continued under instrument flight rules, that adequate arrangements can be made for obtaining a clearance from an air traffic control unit prior to entering instrument flight weather conditions; (c) traffic control is provided by the appropriate police force; (d) the police force consents to the take-off. Similar rules there? Another pilot might have been helpful. m |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Happy Dog wrote:
Similar rules there? Another pilot might have been helpful. One competent pilot would have been sufficient. Matt |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... "Potato Chip" wrote in message oups.com... holy smokes, this guy is deep in the hole now. i doubt insurance will cover any of the damage. totalled airplane, damage to the truck, damage to the fire engine, and towing. Why? If the guy has insurance, he's covered. Same as if you wreck your (insured) car while driving drunk, without a license, doing the nasty with under-age prostitutes, taking pot shots out the window with your illegal machine gun, and transporting a trunk full of mary-jane.. You'd have a heck of a time getting the *next* policy underwritten, but your current policy is in effect... KB Nope Car insurance is different. He was covered on the landing because it was an emergency, but he wasnt covered on the take off unless he had insurance for off airport take off and landings. He should of let the toe truck take it. If your drunk and crash your not covered. Ask your agent. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Aluckyguess wrote: Nope Car insurance is different. He was covered on the landing because it was an emergency, but he wasnt covered on the take off unless he had insurance for off airport take off and landings. It is the odd and rare policy that would list off airport operations as not covered for an aircraft such as a 210. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My first aerobatic lesson | Marco Rispoli | Piloting | 6 | April 13th 05 02:21 PM |
Tamed by the Tailwheel | [email protected] | Piloting | 84 | January 18th 05 04:08 PM |
24M of Cocaine in a crashed plane | Jim Fisher | Piloting | 20 | January 6th 05 01:43 AM |
Three more newbie Qs, if you don't mind :) | Ramapriya | Piloting | 17 | November 7th 04 05:03 AM |
C-141 emergency landing Christchurch | Miche | Military Aviation | 11 | February 6th 04 04:04 AM |