Widower stabbed Air Traffic Controller?

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Could go either way. If the primary system was operational they'd just be
combined at one scope and you used a larger range to see all of the
....

If you had read and understood the report as you claim, you wouldn't
write this. It's described in detail that the controller was working two
stations, and there is even a picture of the situation in the report.

Stefan

"Stefan" wrote in message
...
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Could go either way. If the primary system was operational they'd just
be combined at one scope and you used a larger range to see all of the
...

If you had read and understood the report as you claim, you wouldn't write
this. It's described in detail that the controller was working two
stations, and there is even a picture of the situation in the report.


What I wrote above has nothing to do with the collision.

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:37:49 +0100, Stefan
wrote:

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Could go either way. If the primary system was operational they'd just be
combined at one scope and you used a larger range to see all of the
...

If you had read and understood the report as you claim, you wouldn't
write this. It's described in detail that the controller was working two
stations, and there is even a picture of the situation in the report.

In fairness, he was answering my question regarding whether the
combined US sectors would come up on one scope, not whether the
controller there had the capabilities to do so.