![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I should clarify a bit. Currently, we live in different cities, so I won't have access to the airplane for a year or so. That's why I am trying to figure out "the path".
From that standpoint, I guess the MEL rating would be good and then build time in the local Cougar or Travelair. Seems like the name of the game will be "multi" hours. There are just not hardly any well equiped twins in the area. They are all run-out trainers. Thanks, RC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I should clarify a bit. Currently, we live in different cities, so I
won't have access to the airplane for a year or so. That's why I am trying to figure out "the path". For the money you'd spend getting competent and insurable in a twin, maybe "the path" is to take that money and buy your own single. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose,
I thinking you might be right. A thought that came up today was to find a good, well cared for 35 or 33 Bonanza with some sort of relatively modern avionics and find a partner in it. Nothing too fancy, just a good servicable machine with a full IFR panel in it and some sort of IFR cert. GPS. Like you say, the numbers might be advantageous that route. I have been spending $2,500 to $3,000 a month working on the instrument rating and building time. Of course, that included instructor time, and I was flying two and three days a week. Also seems that working on a Commercial would help the insurance too. Still brainstorming, but you fellows have some good ideas. That's why I asked in the first place!! Thanks, RC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
super90 wrote:
Also seems that working on a Commercial would help the insurance too. well, I got a discount with my renter insurance when I got the instrument rating, but the commercial certificate didn't make a difference in their opinion... --Sylvain |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sylvain wrote:
super90 wrote: Also seems that working on a Commercial would help the insurance too. well, I got a discount with my renter insurance when I got the instrument rating, but the commercial certificate didn't make a difference in their opinion... Passengers like it though... -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When insuring our Aztec, we found very few underwriters (3 if I remember
right) willing to insure "transition twin pilots" i.e. transitioning into a twin. Our lowest time/rated partner (the one the insurance is primarily based on) had less than 500 hours, is PPL and IR. We all did our multi training just before purchasing the Aztec, so we all had very low twin time. Myself and one other partner are Commercial and IR, I'm a CFII and he's also ASES. Only our PPL partner was required to fly 25 hours with an MEI before solo in the Aztec. We were told (right or wrong) that our Commercial certs and other ratings helped our cause. Our broker told us more underwriters were interested and we got more quotes because of it. Maybe he was just blowing smoke up our butt, but if it's true, then this is what I would concentrate on: Get your commercial certificate and build your time above 500 hours, then get your multi rating. If you get your multi first and you save your money for hours of twin flying, the hour building will slow dramatically. Your best investment will be to build your time in a single, it will save you some serious insurance premium bucks when you move into the Baron. YMMV Jim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "super90" wrote in message ... Jose, I thinking you might be right. A thought that came up today was to find a good, well cared for 35 or 33 Bonanza with some sort of relatively modern avionics and find a partner in it. Nothing too fancy, just a good servicable machine with a full IFR panel in it and some sort of IFR cert. GPS. Like you say, the numbers might be advantageous that route. I have been spending $2,500 to $3,000 a month working on the instrument rating and building time. Of course, that included instructor time, and I was flying two and three days a week. Also seems that working on a Commercial would help the insurance too. Still brainstorming, but you fellows have some good ideas. That's why I asked in the first place!! Thanks, RC -- super90 As others have said, a commercial certificate won't affect your insurance rates but it might make it possible to get quotes from companies that won't quote a private pilot in a particular airplane. As the airplanes get more sofisticated, insurance companies start to expect that you will have more advanced ratings. Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LINDA WEST of Chipman Moving & Storage/CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES likes to commit Fraud & Forgery likes to commit Fraud & Forgery | capaliwoda | Piloting | 0 | October 13th 05 04:08 PM |
Engine moving day... | Gene Z. Ragan | Home Built | 2 | March 16th 04 01:26 AM |
Red Baron vs. Rickenbacker? | Gregorso | Military Aviation | 28 | October 13th 03 07:26 PM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Piloting | 131 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |