![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tim Auckland" wrote in message
... The ambiguity is still there. No, I think it's cleared up now (finally!). The first sentence in the newly revised wording hints that a procedure turn is not necessary unless "it is necessary to reverse direction...". The first sentence, taken by itself, is still slightly ambiguous (though less so than before, since it now says that the procedure is "prescribed" when a direction-reversal is necessary; in other words, when the FAA thinks you need to reverse course, they prescribe a PT, by charting it). However, the second sentence completely overrides the first sentence. I'd say it clarifies rather than overrides--the second sentence eliminates the ambiguity that would otherwise have been present in the first sentence. It states that the PT (or hold-in-lieu) is a required maneuver when it is depicted on the approach chart. The third sentence then goes on to say that the procedure turn is not permitted in certain circumstances. The note then goes on to say that the pilot may elect to use the procedure turn when it is not permitted if she or he first receives an amended clearance from ATC. Yup. That all seems unambiguous now. It'd also be way clearer if the FAA just dropped the "is a required maneuver when depicted on the approach plate" concept, I think that concept is what clears up the previous ambiguity--the depicted PT is required, apart from the specifically listed exceptions. --Gary "New: Revised October 18, 2005 5-4-9. Procedure Turn A procedure turn is the maneuver prescribed when it is necessary to reverse direction to establish the aircraft inbound on an intermediate or final approach course. The procedure turn or hold-in-lieu-of-PT is a required maneuver when it is depicted on the approach chart. However, the procedure turn or hold-in-lieu-of-PT is not permitted when the symbol "No PT" is depicted on the initial segment being used, when a RADAR VECTOR to the final approach course is provided, or when conducting a timed approach from a holding fix. The altitude prescribed for the procedure turn is a minimum altitude until the aircraft is established on the inbound course. The maneuver must be completed within the distance specified in the profile view. Note The pilot may elect to use the procedure turn or hold-in-lieu-of-PT when it is not required by the procedure, but must first receive an amended clearance from ATC. When ATC is Radar vectoring to the final approach course or to the Intermediate Fix, ATC may specify in the approach clearance "CLEARED STRAIGHT-IN (type) APPROACH" to insure the procedure turn or hold-in-lieu-of-PT is not to be flown. If the pilot is uncertain whether the ATC clearance intends for a procedure turn to be conducted or to allow for a straight-in approach, the pilot shall immediately request clarification from ATC (14 CFR Part 91.123). " |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
!!! WARNING -- AOPA credit card holders. The credit card company is trying to change the rules in mid-game. Read the statement sent to you by MBNA. | Chuck | Owning | 22 | May 23rd 05 12:37 AM |
WARNING -- AOPA credit card holders. The credit card company is trying to change the rules in mid-game. Read the statement sent to you by MBNA. | Chuck | Owning | 7 | May 5th 05 08:01 PM |
How do you explain why the A/S increases on thermal entry? | Fred | Soaring | 43 | April 24th 05 02:33 PM |