![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very, very good argument. You should cc this to AOPA.
David Megginson wrote: I think it's worth taking a different perspective on this. Let's say that you have a moderately busy, medium-sized airport near a medium-sized city -- there are (say) 20-30 airline flights in and out every day. That airport has an FAA tower, and light aircraft account for the majority of the movements. Should light aircraft owners pay the majority of the cost of operating the tower, since we make the majority of the radio calls? To answer the question, consider what would happen if the tower were closed. We all know how to fly in and out of airports without a tower -- even the bizjets can handle that -- and on an IFR day, most of the recreational pilots disappear, and the rest of us will simply do one-in/one-out full procedure approaches. We might lose 10-15 minutes occasionally, but that's no big deal. Now, consider the airlines' CRJs or 737s having to share that airspace with us, holding for 15 minutes waiting for a turn to approach in IMC, or joining the VFR traffic pattern #5 for landing behind a Cessna 150. With that in mind, who gets most of the benefits from having a control tower? I think the same is true of a lot of ATC services. Light aircraft talk a lot to ATC, but to a large extent, we're doing so only to help the heavy iron keep moving efficiently around us. It seems fair that the airlines (and maybe bizjet operators) pay most of the cost, since they get most of the benefit. All the best, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|