|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
January 31st 04, 07:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Roy Smith wrote: There was no need to issue an EFC time, because the expectation was that there would be no delay. I'm not sure what the correct phrasology is, but it's effectively, "Expect further clearance upon reaching the fix". Which is the same as an EFC time. So one way or the other you know what to do if you lose comm. 
|
|
#2
January 31st 04, 07:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Newps" wrote in message news:KiTSb.148223$Rc4.1190662@attbi_s54... Which is the same as an EFC time. So one way or the other you know what to do if you lose comm. No, an EFC time is the time a pilot can expect to receive clearance beyond a clearance limit.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 195 | November 28th 05 10:06 PM |
| Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
| Lost comm altitude? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | January 11th 04 12:29 AM |
| Picking up a Clearance Airborne | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 03 01:31 AM |
| Big John Bites Dicks (Security Clearance) | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 27 | August 21st 03 12:40 AM |
Hybrid Mode
