![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter R." wrote:
Yes, I am going to maintain that premise because even more unthinkable, someone was actually killed flying a GPS approach with nothing but a VFR GPS. Here's the accident report: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...23X05372&key=1 -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
"Peter R." wrote: Yes, I am going to maintain that premise because even more unthinkable, someone was actually killed flying a GPS approach with nothing but a VFR GPS. Here's the accident report: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...23X05372&key=1 According to the accident report the plane impacted a tower just left of the centerline but 450 below the published minimum height. Short of WAAS no GPS will keep you from trouble if you don't follow the altitude restrictions on the plate. I find it interesting that the report mentions that a GPS was found in the plane but makes no mention of charts on board. Could this have been a case of him not having the plate but trying to fly the approach from his VFR GPS? If this is the case the certification level of the GPS has no bearing in the crash. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Theune wrote:
Peter R. wrote: "Peter R." wrote: Yes, I am going to maintain that premise because even more unthinkable, someone was actually killed flying a GPS approach with nothing but a VFR GPS. Here's the accident report: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...23X05372&key=1 According to the accident report the plane impacted a tower just left of the centerline but 450 below the published minimum height. Short of WAAS no GPS will keep you from trouble if you don't follow the altitude restrictions on the plate. I find it interesting that the report mentions that a GPS was found in the plane but makes no mention of charts on board. Could this have been a case of him not having the plate but trying to fly the approach from his VFR GPS? If this is the case the certification level of the GPS has no bearing in the crash. That accident was the result of the pilot's failure to fly the correct altitude. It had nothing to do with the type of GPS being used. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
That accident was the result of the pilot's failure to fly the correct altitude. It had nothing to do with the type of GPS being used. Perhaps, but the reason for my reference to the accident in this thread was to support my point that the possibility exists for instrument-rated pilots to use a VFR GPS as the only means of navigation. It is unquestionable that this accident pilot did. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps, but the reason for my reference to the accident in this thread was
to support my point that the possibility exists for instrument-rated pilots to use a VFR GPS as the only means of navigation. It is unquestionable that this accident pilot did. It is =not= unquestionable that this accident pilot did. It is known that a VFR GPS was found at the accident site. If a tuna sandwich was found there, would that be incontrivertable evidence that the pilot was relying solely on a tuna sandwich for IFR flight? Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose,
If a tuna sandwich was found there, would that be incontrivertable evidence that the pilot was relying solely on a tuna sandwich for IFR flight? In that case, it would of course be incontrovertible that both occupants had the fish and the accident was caused by that. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/11/2005 08:33, Jose wrote:
Perhaps, but the reason for my reference to the accident in this thread was to support my point that the possibility exists for instrument-rated pilots to use a VFR GPS as the only means of navigation. It is unquestionable that this accident pilot did. It is =not= unquestionable that this accident pilot did. It is known that a VFR GPS was found at the accident site. If a tuna sandwich was found there, would that be incontrivertable evidence that the pilot was relying solely on a tuna sandwich for IFR flight? Perhaps not, but it might come in handy ;-) Sorry, you're response (with which I agree 100%) just made me laugh. Jose -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Sacramento, CA |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
It is =not= unquestionable that this accident pilot did. It is known that a VFR GPS was found at the accident site. The pilot was cleared to fly a GPS approach into the airport and struck the tower along the approach course. How else was he navigating, if not by the VFR GPS? Again, I agree that hitting the tower was not due to the navigation device used. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... Again, I agree that hitting the tower was not due to the navigation device used. Then why did you bring this accident into the discussion? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
Perhaps, but the reason for my reference to the accident in this thread was to support my point that the possibility exists for instrument-rated pilots to use a VFR GPS as the only means of navigation. It is unquestionable that this accident pilot did. It is =not= unquestionable that this accident pilot did. It is known that a VFR GPS was found at the accident site. If a tuna sandwich was found there, would that be incontrivertable evidence that the pilot was relying solely on a tuna sandwich for IFR flight? Jose If he had asked for the Tuna Fish approach to his destination I would agree. He asked for the GPS approach and the only GPS on board his aircraft was the hand held. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|