A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

IFR with a VFR GPS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 11th 05, 04:17 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS

: technological level than in the USA; the pilot magazines also largely
: ignore the IFR market. And IFR activity is even lower elsewhere in
: Europe.

Interesting. Perhaps some Canadians reading can pipe in on this idea. This
past summer while flying through Canada to Alaska, it certainly seemed like IFR was
the vast minority. I'm sure some of it was that I was in the sticks for a lot of the
time, but even in the relatively populated plains provinces, one didn't hear much
about IFR traffic (or traffic at all for that matter). Perhaps the US just has more
infrastructure so IFR is easier to do casually for PP?

Just a thought... not harping on anyone's turf...

-Cory

--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

  #2  
Old November 16th 05, 01:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS


wrote:

Interesting. Perhaps some Canadians reading can pipe in on this idea. This
past summer while flying through Canada to Alaska, it certainly seemed like IFR was
the vast minority. I'm sure some of it was that I was in the sticks for a lot of the
time, but even in the relatively populated plains provinces, one didn't hear much
about IFR traffic (or traffic at all for that matter). Perhaps the US just has more
infrastructure so IFR is easier to do casually for PP?


I often file IFR in both central Canada and the northeastern U.S. in my
Warrior, and on long cross-country flights in both countries, I'll
often be the only light aircraft talking to ATC in the sector. The
main exception is when someone's doing practice approaches down below
me, though once in a while I'll hear a piston twin or another single
doing what I'm doing. You'll see a lot of IFR piston traffic (mostly
twins) into places like Toronto/City Centre, though.

In the late fall, winter, and early spring, IFR can be tricky because
of the risk of icing, but the same is true for the northern U.S. You
were flying across the northern Canada, where a lot of the traffic
still goes on floats -- as you know, float plane pilots get nosebleeds
above 1,000 feet AGL, so they can't usually make IFR altitudes and have
to skim the treetops.


All the best,


David

  #3  
Old November 16th 05, 01:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS

wrote:
: I often file IFR in both central Canada and the northeastern U.S. in my
: Warrior, and on long cross-country flights in both countries, I'll
: often be the only light aircraft talking to ATC in the sector. The
: main exception is when someone's doing practice approaches down below
: me, though once in a while I'll hear a piston twin or another single
: doing what I'm doing. You'll see a lot of IFR piston traffic (mostly
: twins) into places like Toronto/City Centre, though.

Yes, I would believe that in the eastern side of Canada there's more traffic.
I was pretty much keeping to the relatively unpopulated areas during the flight
(Plains of SK, AB and further north by BC). Closest I got was Edmonton Center (40 nm
or so). There was some traffic on ATC, but they almost seemed surprised when I called
them up. Even though I was entering their airspace, they seemed to just figure I was
transitional VFR and weren't even looking for me.

: In the late fall, winter, and early spring, IFR can be tricky because
: of the risk of icing, but the same is true for the northern U.S. You
: were flying across the northern Canada, where a lot of the traffic
: still goes on floats -- as you know, float plane pilots get nosebleeds
: above 1,000 feet AGL, so they can't usually make IFR altitudes and have
: to skim the treetops.

Yeah, I guess that makes sense. For all the same reasons IFR in light GA
planes in the midwest/northeast US is often impassable (icing and embed CB) IFR in
even the populated areas of Canada are often difficult. Sure seemed like scud running
MVFR was the rule of the day when I was up there. As far as your float plane comment,
that's pretty true. Heck, when I filed a flight plan in MVFR going to follow the
road, the *briefer* said, "Oh, you want the route of flight to be follow highway 43 to
Lloydmindster... OK." I can say I got some pretty unusual looks fueling up my Cherokee
in northern BC and in the Yukon. Things like, "Did they put the wings on your plane
on upside down?" One guy told me he'd never *seen* a low-wing!

Different flying world. A lot like Alaska... stepping back in aviation time.

-Cory


--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.