![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... Perhaps, but the reason for my reference to the accident in this thread was to support my point that the possibility exists for instrument-rated pilots to use a VFR GPS as the only means of navigation. It is unquestionable that this accident pilot did. That's unquestionable only if the VFR GPS was the only nav gear aboard the airplane. I think that unlikely. Since the aircraft struck a tower which was only slightly off the FAC there's no reason to believe a navigational error contributed to this accident. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
That's unquestionable only if the VFR GPS was the only nav gear aboard the airplane. I think that unlikely. The pilot was cleared to fly a GPS approach in an aircraft without an IFR certified GPS. How else is he going to navigate the approach course? -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... The pilot was cleared to fly a GPS approach in an aircraft without an IFR certified GPS. How else is he going to navigate the approach course? Irrelevant. The presence of a VFR GPS does not preclude the use of any other navigational systems. Given that the aircraft struck a tower that was very nearly on the FAC centerline it appears that navigating the approach course was not a problem. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
Irrelevant. The presence of a VFR GPS does not preclude the use of any other navigational systems. What other navigational system is used once the aircraft is cleared for a GPS approach? Given that the aircraft struck a tower that was very nearly on the FAC centerline it appears that navigating the approach course was not a problem. The presence of the GPS may be irrelevant to the cause of the accident, but it is completely relevant to my original point that a pilot may be tempted to use a VFR GPS as the sole means of navigation, legal or otherwise. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... What other navigational system is used once the aircraft is cleared for a GPS approach? Anything the pilot has available and wishes to use. The presence of the GPS may be irrelevant to the cause of the accident, but it is completely relevant to my original point that a pilot may be tempted to use a VFR GPS as the sole means of navigation, legal or otherwise. That was idiocy. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
The presence of the GPS may be irrelevant to the cause of the accident, but it is completely relevant to my original point that a pilot may be tempted to use a VFR GPS as the sole means of navigation, legal or otherwise. That was idiocy Yep, your lack of an intelligent response was already noted. Now you are repeating yourself. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... Yep, your lack of an intelligent response was already noted. Now you are repeating yourself. We all have our roles. You keep demonstrating idiocy, I'll keep pointing it out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|