A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

IFR with a VFR GPS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 11th 05, 07:26 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

Irrelevant. The presence of a VFR GPS does not preclude the use of any
other navigational systems.


What other navigational system is used once the aircraft is cleared for a
GPS approach?

Given that the aircraft struck a tower that was
very nearly on the FAC centerline it appears that navigating the approach
course was not a problem.


The presence of the GPS may be irrelevant to the cause of the accident, but
it is completely relevant to my original point that a pilot may be tempted
to use a VFR GPS as the sole means of navigation, legal or otherwise.

--
Peter
























----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #2  
Old November 11th 05, 07:35 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS


"Peter R." wrote in message
...

What other navigational system is used once the aircraft is cleared for a
GPS approach?


Anything the pilot has available and wishes to use.



The presence of the GPS may be irrelevant to the cause of the accident,
but
it is completely relevant to my original point that a pilot may be tempted
to use a VFR GPS as the sole means of navigation, legal or otherwise.


That was idiocy.


  #3  
Old November 11th 05, 07:37 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:


The presence of the GPS may be irrelevant to the cause of the accident,
but
it is completely relevant to my original point that a pilot may be tempted
to use a VFR GPS as the sole means of navigation, legal or otherwise.


That was idiocy


Yep, your lack of an intelligent response was already noted. Now you are
repeating yourself.

--
Peter
























----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #4  
Old November 11th 05, 07:42 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS


"Peter R." wrote in message
...

Yep, your lack of an intelligent response was already noted. Now you are
repeating yourself.


We all have our roles. You keep demonstrating idiocy, I'll keep pointing it
out.


  #5  
Old November 11th 05, 07:44 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Peter R." wrote in message
...

Yep, your lack of an intelligent response was already noted. Now you are
repeating yourself.


We all have our roles. You keep demonstrating idiocy, I'll keep pointing it
out.


Why is it idiocy? You never explained your reasoning.

--
Peter
























----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #6  
Old November 11th 05, 09:56 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS

Peter R. wrote:

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:


"Peter R." wrote in message
...

Yep, your lack of an intelligent response was already noted. Now you are
repeating yourself.


We all have our roles. You keep demonstrating idiocy, I'll keep pointing it
out.



Why is it idiocy? You never explained your reasoning.

You must be new here. ;-)
  #7  
Old November 11th 05, 10:21 PM
Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS

One difference I have not seen mentioned is how the VFR GPS appears in
the scan and relates to the other instruments. I know having a
permanently mounted, cable free installation where everything is always
where it's supposed to be makes a difference in the usability of an
instrument. This is one reason why I don't think we will ever see IFR
certified handhelds. The installation is part of the certification.

  #8  
Old November 12th 05, 01:40 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS


"Peter R." wrote in message
...

Why is it idiocy? You never explained your reasoning.


A non-idiot doesn't need an explanation and an idiot wouldn't understand
one.


  #9  
Old November 12th 05, 02:08 AM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Peter R." wrote in message
...

Why is it idiocy? You never explained your reasoning.


A non-idiot doesn't need an explanation and an idiot wouldn't understand
one.


Reached the end of your intellectual limit, I see. Too bad, I used to have
some respect for you.

--
Peter
























----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.