![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 20:49:04 -0700, Kevin O'Brien wrote:
Wood's good stuff. It's tough to beat wood for strength. Plenty of planes have gone over 500 MPH on wooden wings. (Me163, DH Vampire). Actually, the wings on the DH Vampire were metal. "The DH-100 was of an all metal construction apart from the cockpit section which was made from ply and balsa wood as in the de Havilland Mosquito". See: http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/His...00/Vampire.htm This doesn't detract from the rest of your treatise though. There is nothing wrong with wood as a construction material, as long as the aircraft can be hangared. -- Kevin Horton Ottawa |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Kevin Horton says...
Actually, the wings on the DH Vampire were metal. "The DH-100 was of an all metal construction apart from the cockpit section which was made from ply and balsa wood as in the de Havilland Mosquito". Boy, I hate being wrong. Thanks for the correction though. I thought it was a wood wing, alloy fuse thing (rather like the 163) when it actually is t'other way round, then. With the fuse also alloy from about where the turbojet sits. cheers -=K=- Rule #1: Don't hit anything big. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|