A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

IFR with a VFR GPS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 15th 05, 09:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Marco Leon" mmleon(at)yahoo.com wrote in message
...

Have you ever read either TSO-c146a or TSO-c129? One of the requirements
specifies that the database in an IFR-certified box adhere to a higher
tolerance of corruptibility. Are you sure the VFR portable's database

was
built to the same specifications? If not--higher risk.


How so?

If you really don't see the increased risk in using a database that is not
safeguarded from being corrupted to a level that another one that is, then
your ability to comprehend the subject matter at hand is far below the rest
of the thread's participants. It would be useless to explain the other
requirements of the TSO to you because you obviously would not understand
any of the concepts.

I can go on and list each item-by-item but you seem to be literate so

you
can read the TSOs at your leisure. Bottom line is as I stated in my
previous
post that you don't personally believe the requirements outlined in

these
documents reduce risk in any way, shape, or form.

If that's the case, I'm glad you don't help the FAA develop these
standards.


If you believe there is a higher risk I think you should be able to

identify
that risk.


You're trolling.


  #2  
Old November 15th 05, 09:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default IFR with a VFR GPS


"Marco Leon" mmleon(at)yahoo.com wrote in message
...

If you really don't see the increased risk in using a database that is not
safeguarded from being corrupted to a level that another one that is, then
your ability to comprehend the subject matter at hand is far below the
rest
of the thread's participants. It would be useless to explain the other
requirements of the TSO to you because you obviously would not understand
any of the concepts.


I can understand anything you can explain. Do you think you can explain the
hazard in the use of a handheld GPS during IFR enroute flight in US
controlled airspace? Nobody else could.



You're trolling.


You bet I am. I'm trolling for someone, anyone, that can identify any risk
in the use of a handheld GPS during IFR enroute flight in US controlled
airspace. I've been doing that for several years without even a nibble.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.