![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
The recent questions about medical certificate, paper trail, sport pilot etc.. etc..got me thinking. What is the reasoning behind requiring a medical for pilots? Why is a minor medical condition disqualifying for flying a Cessna 172, when the same person can drive a 20,000 lb truck on public roads? Are there statistic to show that medically unfit pilots are a greater danger to society compared to other activities? Well you know... There's a somewhat revealing discussion of the medical requirement in the preamble to the Sport Pilot NPRM (it's somewhere on faa.gov but my link to it no longer works, since it's pretty old). In particular, among other things, it cites the safety record of sailplanes as a justification for the so-called "drivers license medical" that was initially put into the rule. It strongly suggests that the writers of the rule felt that a medical requirement is a) superfluous, certainly for flying LSA and b) in very high demand and critical for survival of the LSA industry. Of course, as we all know, the medical requirement was very badly crippled in the final version of the rule, but that would appear to have only been the result of pressure from special interests (the insurance companies probably). What's important is, it actually succeeded in passing without formally requiring a medical certificate - a stunning achievement if you really think about it. So clearly, there seems to be disagreement even within the FAA about whether or not a medical requirement really does any good. The fact that Sport Pilot even made it out the door in its current form strongly indicates this..... By the way, I think the preamble made a similar argument to yours - if a pilot holds a valid DL and can drive a multi-ton vehicle down the road, surely (s)he is fit enough to fly an LSA safely..... My personal case is a good example. I can't obtain and maintain a class III anymore and yet I'm in the best health of my entire life and more than fit to fly an airplane. I've accumulated more then 500 hours of flight time since my class III went away with no problems.. There're a lot of other guys just like me out there also flying without problems.... So as they say, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck..... LS N646F |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Trying to Fly | AliR | Piloting | 33 | May 9th 05 12:00 AM |
Delta Pilots End Era of Luxurious Pay | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 42 | November 18th 04 05:46 AM |
What's minimum safe O2 level? | PaulH | Piloting | 29 | November 9th 04 07:35 PM |
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 02:58 PM |