![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Marco Leon wrote: Yes, I know but I wasn't sure if I was not getting assigned GPS approaches [without requesting them] by filing /G. Do you recall if the FAA disseminated *why* they dropped the "approach" distinction? First off you make it sound as if you will get a GPS approach forced on you with no recourse. If the controller offers a GPS approach and you are unable then say so. The FAA dropped the approach distinction because there are probably as many airplanes that can legally go GPS direct without approach capability as there are with approach capability. It was simply an oversight on their part. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote in message ... Marco Leon wrote: Yes, I know but I wasn't sure if I was not getting assigned GPS approaches [without requesting them] by filing /G. Do you recall if the FAA disseminated *why* they dropped the "approach" distinction? First off you make it sound as if you will get a GPS approach forced on you with no recourse. If the controller offers a GPS approach and you are unable then say so. The FAA dropped the approach distinction because there are probably as many airplanes that can legally go GPS direct without approach capability as there are with approach capability. It was simply an oversight on their part. I actually would prefer [pure] GPS approaches to other non-precision approaches. Thanks by the way--you answered my question in the piloting group ![]() Marco Leon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does your airport WiFi? | john smith | Piloting | 118 | July 12th 05 03:47 PM |