![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is another one I wanted to mention: AC 90-94.
"Guidelines for Using GPS Equipment for IFR En Route & Terminal Operations & for Nonprecision Instrument Approaches (12/14/94) (AFS-820)" You can find it here, if you're an AOPA member: http://www.aopa.org/members/files/ac/ac90-94.pdf On 11/18/2005 4:41 PM, Mark Hansen wrote: On 11/18/2005 3:43 PM, tom pettit tompetatpeak wrote: I don't currently have any navigation equipment. I was hoping that a single, certified, gps unit could be used as primary, with an uncertified unit as back up. I was hoping I didn't need anything else. Reading the FARS it isn't very specific, or more likely, I just don't know enough about this stuff yet. thanks, tom Well, start with FAR 91.205. Specifically, 91.205 (d), and 91.205 (d) (2), where it state: "...navigational equipment appropriate to the ground facilities to be used". Then, have a look at the AIM, in the section on Navigational Aids (section 1), specifically, 1-1-19 (d) (1), which talks about Authorization to conduct any GPS operation under IFR, and later it talks about the requirements for alternate navigation equipment. Basically, what this all boils down to, is this: If you have a IFR-certified GPS system (TSO-129 certified), like the Garmin GNS 430, you can use it for IFR operations, but the plane needs to be equipped with the typical IFR navigation radios anyway. There are some exceptions, but this should get you thinking in the right direction. I would expect that the GPS systems that can be used without any other nav equipment on board would be more expensive than a TSO-129 system + standard nav gear anyway. I hope this helps, "Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... On 11/18/2005 13:28, tom pettit tompetatpeak wrote: I'm currently flying VFR in a vfr equipped plane. What would be the lowest cost GPS based instrument system I could install and be legal for IFR flying? I looked through the last six months of this newsgroup, but didn't see a FAQ or the answer to the above, so I hope it won't be something that was just hashed out. thanks, tom pettit Keep in mind that it takes a specific unit (a TSO one forty something rather than the TSO 129... I'm not sure I have those number correct) for the GPS unit to be used as the sole means of IFR navigation. I mention this, because you said your plane is not currently IFR capable. In order to use one of the TSO 129 certified GPS units for IFR flight, the plane must still have the navigation equipment on board for the ground based navigation aids along the route of flight. Does any of this apply to you? If not, sorry if I misunderstood your situation. -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Sacramento, CA -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Sacramento, CA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The frustrating economics of aviation | C J Campbell | Piloting | 96 | July 21st 04 04:41 PM |
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 47 | May 22nd 04 03:36 AM |
Lowest Cost GPS Tracking System on the Market | Johann Blake | Soaring | 1 | November 19th 03 04:50 PM |
Lowest Cost GPS Tracking System on the Market | Johann Blake | Piloting | 0 | November 19th 03 04:06 PM |
Lowest cost per mile flown motor- 2 stroke | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 0 | July 2nd 03 06:25 AM |