![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news:CX9gf.1261$pF.1153@fed1read04... It's a problem during a coupled approach especially if the pilot is planning to do an autoland. It's not a problem if the weather is good. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
wrote in message news:CX9gf.1261$pF.1153@fed1read04... It's a problem during a coupled approach especially if the pilot is planning to do an autoland. It's not a problem if the weather is good. Not so, Steve. It can cause control problems and certainly adversely affect an autoland. That is why your handbook contains a caveat about such approaches. Approach couplers and autoland systems are weather independent.~ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Limitations on the approach chart probably do not allow the
ILS when the tower is closed or more than one hour after the last weather observation. wrote in message news:cjlgf.4216$pF.687@fed1read04... | Steven P. McNicoll wrote: | wrote in message news:CX9gf.1261$pF.1153@fed1read04... | | It's a problem during a coupled approach especially if the pilot is | planning to do an autoland. | | | | It's not a problem if the weather is good. | | | Not so, Steve. It can cause control problems and certainly adversely | affect an autoland. That is why your handbook contains a caveat about | such approaches. | | Approach couplers and autoland systems are weather independent.~ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:g0mgf.4463$QW2.2168@dukeread08... Limitations on the approach chart probably do not allow the ILS when the tower is closed or more than one hour after the last weather observation. What airport are you referring to? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:48:30 -0600, "Jim Macklin"
wrote: Limitations on the approach chart probably do not allow the ILS when the tower is closed or more than one hour after the last weather observation. RW 29 at PWM has an ILS hold charted on the airport diagram, but I don't see anything preventing it's use when the tower is closed on the approach chart: http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0511/00329IL29.PDF |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news:cjlgf.4216$pF.687@fed1read04... Not so, Steve. It can cause control problems and certainly adversely affect an autoland. That is why your handbook contains a caveat about such approaches. Approach couplers and autoland systems are weather independent.~ You're mistaken. There's no need for approach couplers and autoland systems when the weather is good. It's not a problem because the pilots can see. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
wrote in message news:cjlgf.4216$pF.687@fed1read04... You're mistaken. There's no need for approach couplers and autoland systems when the weather is good. It's not a problem because the pilots can see. wrong. There might be "need" to do autolanding for 3 month (?) currency. I hear this often at night for jets going into SFO. Granted the pilots turn off the autopilot with no loss of safety but the need is still there. Gerald |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message news ![]() wrong. There might be "need" to do autolanding for 3 month (?) currency. It's not a problem because the pilots can see. The need for currency doesn't alter the weather. I hear this often at night for jets going into SFO. SFO has a full-time tower. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrong. There might be "need" to do autolanding for 3 month (?)
currency. It's not a problem because the pilots can see. The need for currency doesn't alter the weather. correct but there is a need to do an autoland. It is not *required* since the weather is good enough but the need is still there. I hear this often at night for jets going into SFO. SFO has a full-time tower. correct but I was referring to jets asking to do a CAT III approach for currency even though it is VFR. Gerald |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message . net... correct but there is a need to do an autoland. It is not *required* since the weather is good enough but the need is still there. Don't be silly. There's clearly no need to do an autoland in good weather. correct but I was referring to jets asking to do a CAT III approach for currency even though it is VFR. We're talking about ILS critical areas when the tower is closed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
comment period reopened on DC area "ADIZ" | Bob Noel | Piloting | 3 | November 15th 05 04:39 PM |
Los Angeles radio tower crash kills 2 | Paul Hirose | Piloting | 178 | August 6th 05 03:46 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
ILS Critical Area signage: Localizer or Glideslope? | Adam K. | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 30th 03 10:09 PM |
Patrick AFB Area Log, Monday 30 June 2003 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | July 1st 03 06:37 AM |