![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() G Farris wrote: I have heard that the left tank becomes slightly pressurized, due to the forward-facing vent on that tank, which is why it drains faster than the other. I do not claim this to be a fact - just something I've heard. The left tank becomes pressurized because the vent tube is slightly out of rig. It's supposed to be directly behind the strut. If it gets a clear view of the incoming slipstream it forces a lot more air into the tank. That forces fuel from the left to the right tank via the vent line above the headliner in the cockpit. You will never solve the problem until the vent tube under the left wing is positioned correctly and then you only mitigate the problem to a certain degree. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Newps wrote: G Farris wrote: I have heard that the left tank becomes slightly pressurized, due to the forward-facing vent on that tank, which is why it drains faster than the other. I do not claim this to be a fact - just something I've heard. The left tank becomes pressurized because the vent tube is slightly out of rig. It's supposed to be directly behind the strut. If it gets a clear view of the incoming slipstream it forces a lot more air into the tank. That forces fuel from the left to the right tank via the vent line above the headliner in the cockpit. You will never solve the problem until the vent tube under the left wing is positioned correctly and then you only mitigate the problem to a certain degree. Seems to be a popular misconception as to how that fuel gets across to the other side. It can flow through the FUEL lines, at any fuel level, while the selector is on both. If, for instance, the airplane is parked left wing low, the fuel will run down through the fuel line from the right tank, through the selector valve, and up the other fuel line into the left tank. No mystery at all. If the tanks have enough fuel, it will run out the vent onto the ramp. Stopping it requires placing the selector on L or R or OFF. The old Cessna 150s, with their on/off system, had the lines teed together before the valve and would do this anytime, valve on or off. The fuel will run across the VENT line only if the tanks are full. The fuel venting system applies the same pressure to both tanks. The vent, whether behind the strut or below it, leads to the left tank, and the vent line from that tank across the right tank makes sure that the pressures are equal. Unequal pressures are a result of leaking fuel caps, either at the gasket or through a defective vent check valve, and air will flow through the cap into the tank and cause airflow one way or the other through the vent line, upsetting the pressure balance and causing one tank to drain faster than the other. Pressures are usually negative if the check valve leaks, and possibly could go positive if the gasket had a forward-facing leak. I've seen split gaskets on fuel caps. The vent is located aft of the strut to minimize icing blockage, and one or both caps has a silicone check valve to let air into the tanks in case of vent icing. That valve deteriorates over time and lets air out of the tank. The valve disc isn't available as a separate part; the cap must be replaced. Thankfully, they aren't expensive like Piper's. Dan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I should have quoted a couple of sources regarding fuel tank venting.
For the US, here's the FAR, in part, that deals with it. Note that (a)(1) deals with the icing problem of vents, hence Cessna's locating it behind the strut, and (a)(4) deals with interconnected tanks such as the 172/182's, so a vent system common to both tanks is required to keep tank pressures equal. 23.975 Fuel tank vents and carburetor vapor vents. (a) Each fuel tank must be vented from the top part of the expansion space. In addition - (1) Each vent outlet must be located and constructed in a manner that minimizes the possibility of its being obstructed by ice or other foreign matter; (2) Each vent must be constructed to prevent siphoning of fuel during normal operation; (3) The venting capacity must allow the rapid relief of excessive differences of pressure between the interior and exterior of the tank; (4) Airspaces of tanks with interconnected outlets must be interconnected; (5) There may be no point in any vent line where moisture can accumulate with the airplane in either the ground or level flight attitudes, unless drainage is provided. Any drain valve installed must be accessible for drainage; (6) No vent may terminate at a point where the discharge of fuel from the vent outlet will constitute a fire hazard or from which fumes may enter personnel compartments; and (7) Vents must be arranged to prevent the loss of fuel, except fuel discharged because of thermal expansion, when the airplane is parked in any direction on a ramp having a one percent slope. snip Canadians can find exactly the same thing in CAR 523.975. Dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Newps wrote: G Farris wrote: I have heard that the left tank becomes slightly pressurized, due to the forward-facing vent on that tank, which is why it drains faster than the other. I do not claim this to be a fact - just something I've heard. The left tank becomes pressurized because the vent tube is slightly out of rig. It's supposed to be directly behind the strut. If it gets a clear view of the incoming slipstream it forces a lot more air into the tank. That forces fuel from the left to the right tank via the vent line above the headliner in the cockpit. You will never solve the problem until the vent tube under the left wing is positioned correctly and then you only mitigate the problem to a certain degree. Seems to be a popular misconception as to how that fuel gets across to the other side. (Snip) Dan, your explanation is theoretically correct, but Newps wrote from experience. With an incorrectly located vent, and both tanks full, fuel is forced from left to right. The right tank stays full, and usually dumps fuel out through the cap, which has a vent that opens both positive and negative (Monarch caps, at any rate). Ram air pressure continues to force fuel to the right side, until the left tank empties. The indicator for this is when the right fuel gauge stays put, and the left goes rapidly toward empty. Fuel running off the right flap in flight is another hint. That's how my 182 managed to "burn" 32 gallons/hr on one leg of a long trip. Cessna fixed the problem in later years by adding a vent behind the right strut. For the single vent planes, the location is so critical that it is specified to the hundredth of an inch. That precision is related to airflow, not ice. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan, your explanation is theoretically correct, but Newps wrote from
experience. With an incorrectly located vent, and both tanks full, fuel is forced from left to right. The right tank stays full, and usually dumps fuel out through the cap, which has a vent that opens both positive and negative (Monarch caps, at any rate). I have been maintaining Cessnas for ten years now, and the proper Cessna cap will not allow air out of the tank. By law, an owner MUST use parts as per Cessna parts manuals, and any other cap that isn't PMA'd for that airplane is illegal. There is no way that the airplane is legal if it's doing that, since it doen't comply with the manuals. Dan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Dan, your explanation is theoretically correct, but Newps wrote from experience. With an incorrectly located vent, and both tanks full, fuel is forced from left to right. The right tank stays full, and usually dumps fuel out through the cap, which has a vent that opens both positive and negative (Monarch caps, at any rate). I have been maintaining Cessnas for ten years now, and the proper Cessna cap will not allow air out of the tank. By law, an owner MUST use parts as per Cessna parts manuals, and any other cap that isn't PMA'd for that airplane is illegal. There is no way that the airplane is legal if it's doing that, since it doen't comply with the manuals. Dan Unfortunately, the proper Cessna cap allowed water into the tank. Are you trying to indicate that the highly regarded Monarch caps are illegal? As to the uneven fuel feeding, refer to Cessna Pilot's Association Tech Note 003. The location of the vent pipe behind the strut is critical, as I said in my first post. Dick Meade (Flying Cessnas for 10 years now) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps when you get to twenty, or thirty, or forty, you will understand how
they work. Jim wrote in message oups.com... I have been maintaining Cessnas for ten years now, |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's an AD addressing the requirement for the vented caps on
Cessnas (79-10-14R1), and this refers to Service letter SE77-6, which gives the cap part numbers. The R182 manual I have here also gives the testing details for these caps, which requires that the check valve open at 4 inches water column or less of negative pressure in the tank, and it must not allow any leakage out of the tank at 0.7 PSI or less. It stipulates that any fuel staining around the cap is cause for investigation. Please tell me, Jim, what's wrong with insisting that the caps aren't supposed to allow air out of the tank (except at high pressures as a safety release) and thereby upset the pressure balance between them and allow fuel to cross over in flight, which often leads to fuel loss in flight? Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 29 | February 3rd 08 07:04 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Is Your Airplane Susceptible To Mis Fu eling? A Simple Test For Fuel Contamination. | Nathan Young | Piloting | 4 | June 14th 04 06:13 PM |
Yo! Fuel Tank! | Veeduber | Home Built | 15 | October 25th 03 02:57 AM |