![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/27/2005 9:30 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote the following:
* Ron Rosenfeld : From the (US) AIM: Thank you very much for citing the relevant regs. Is this stuff available online for future reference? Some of that stuff is hard to find but virtually everything the FAA publishes is available on line. Here is a links page that has a lot of it: http://www.clubcherokee.com/links/ Look towards the lower left for the FAA stuff. I find the searchable FAR database at risingup.com to be particularly handy. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Daniel Roesen" wrote in message ... Thank you very much for citing the relevant regs. Is this stuff available online for future reference? The AIM can be found online at: http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/AIM/index.htm Hm... interesting. "optimum rate consistent with the operating characteristics of the aircraft". This is fuzzy. The most economically way to descend a jet is at near idle thrust, tactically. But strategically, that's only true if I'm on my computed economic descent path. So if ATC orders me earlier than reaching my ToD to "descend now FL270", at what rate do I descend? "optimum rate" would be very shallow and be not quick enough for the controller who wants to get me out of the way of something. Should I descend at near idle thrust? But that would bring me down much quicker than strategically economic, as I have to fly a longer distance on a suboptimal low flight level. When the descent is to avoid other traffic, as it is whenever "descend now" is used, quicker is better than slower. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Daniel Roesen" wrote in message ... Hm. I'm lacking any real world experience, but in our little wannabe Sim world (VATSIM) I'm used to crossing restrictions like "XYZ, descend FL120 (to be) level(ed) at FIX" which is to be interpreted as "start descent now with at least 1000fpm and be at FL120 latest at FIX". This is for Europe and confirmed to be real-world compatible by several real-world ATC controllers here. Now I happen to like "flying" in US airspace, where instructions like "XYZ, cross CEDES at 11000ft" are used. Is that to be taken analogue to European interpretation to start descending to 11000ft _now_, or to be taken as "descend 11000ft at own discretion"? It means the pilot can begin descent at the time of his choosing and use the descent rate of his choosing so long as he reaches 11,000 feet not later than CEDES. If the latter, does ATC expect a report like "leaving FL240 for 11000" if not explicitly requested? No. What is the US equivalent of the European clearance to "descend now to X with 1000fpm or more, to be level at FIX"? Is there any at all (short of a full "descend and maintain 11000ft, 1000fpm or more, cross CEDES at level")? There is no equivalent standard US phraseology. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 195 | November 28th 05 10:06 PM |
Taxi Clearance | Ron Rosenfeld | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | September 29th 05 01:57 PM |
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U | Judah | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | February 27th 04 06:02 PM |
Q about lost comms on weird clearance | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 34 | February 2nd 04 09:11 PM |
Picking up a Clearance Airborne | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 03 01:31 AM |