![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks guys.., why start calling names.., I mean, does it make your stance
any stronger..?? Frankly, this tread started out with the question of buying an aircraft and paying a tax. Both of you (and the other bystander) have moved the subject over to a discussion of an "income" tax, as apposed to a simple fee, licensing, and/or a property tax issue.., and you are correct..! However, the subject of whether an "individual", as opposed to a "business".., has a "liability" to pay a tax on the smiple purchase and operation of an aircraft is getting your balls in an uproar. True again, the 16th amendment (as ratified.., another subject?) does give congress the authority to levy and collect a tax on "incomes", but "income" in this case is NOT derived from the purchase or ownership of an aircraft..., unless it is used in a business..!! Oh, and by the way, I have a copy of the incorporation papers for the IRS in the state of Delaware in front of me as I write (smile) which gives it some authority to act as an "agency" with limited powers to collect taxes with regards to alcohol, tobacco, and firearms since it's realignment with the DEA, BATF some years ago. Please keep searching the IRS code for the definition of "income"..!! Now.., back to the subject 45 treads back..., and no name calling..!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
81mm wrote:
Looks guys.., why start calling names.., I mean, does it make your stance any stronger..?? Frankly, this tread started out with the question of buying an aircraft and paying a tax. Both of you (and the other bystander) have moved the subject over to a discussion of an "income" tax, as apposed to a simple fee, licensing, and/or a property tax issue.., and you are correct..! However, the subject of whether an "individual", as opposed to a "business".., has a "liability" to pay a tax on the smiple purchase and operation of an aircraft is getting your balls in an uproar. True again, the 16th amendment (as ratified.., another subject?) does give congress the authority to levy and collect a tax on "incomes", but "income" in this case is NOT derived from the purchase or ownership of an aircraft..., unless it is used in a business..!! Oh, and by the way, I have a copy of the incorporation papers for the IRS in the state of Delaware in front of me as I write (smile) which gives it some authority to act as an "agency" with limited powers to collect taxes with regards to alcohol, tobacco, and firearms since it's realignment with the DEA, BATF some years ago. Please keep searching the IRS code for the definition of "income"..!! Now.., back to the subject 45 treads back..., and no name calling..!! Selling something for more than you paid for it is called making a profit. Profit is taxable as income for individuals as well as businesses. What part of this are you struggling to understand? In the real world very few items purchased by individuals are ever sold for a profit and the big ticket items that are likely to are generally registered in some manner making tax avoidance difficult. If you buy an old chair at the Goodwill store for $25 and it turns out to be a rare antique worth $25,000, you owe the IRS (and most likely your state) taxes on $24,975 of income. The fact that the odds of anyone ever knowing about it are just about nil (unless you have a big mouth, **** someone off, and they turn you in for the reward) does not mean that you are not legally liable for the tax. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is time to plonk him as he is terminally stupid or just being ornery
to get our goats. wrote in message ... 81mm wrote: What part of this are you struggling to understand? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tell'ya what guys.., keep paying taxes you don't owe.., but why misinform
others? As to any other aviation buffs who may be viewing this tread, looks folks, just do the research and think a little about the answers these "true" Americans who have nothing to offer but false information, bad manners, and name calling..!! Now, as to you two bad mannered assholes, as a retired Special Forces type.., if you punks were to speak to me that way in public, I'd smiply tear off your fu&%&'n head and **** in the hole. Now, as per your second hole.., just report to your local IRS office.., bend over and spead your cheeks..!!! My apologies if I offended any of the innocent by-standers..!! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
81mm wrote:
Tell'ya what guys.., keep paying taxes you don't owe.., but why misinform others? As to any other aviation buffs who may be viewing this tread, looks folks, just do the research and think a little about the answers these "true" Americans who have nothing to offer but false information, bad manners, and name calling..!! I'd love to not pay capital gains taxes, but you have yet to show a legal way to avoid them. Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fight! Fight! Fight!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
81mm wrote:
Looks guys.., why start calling names.., I mean, does it make your stance any stronger..?? Frankly, this tread started out with the question of buying an aircraft and paying a tax. Both of you (and the other bystander) have moved the subject over to a discussion of an "income" tax, as apposed to a simple fee, licensing, and/or a property tax issue.., and you are correct..! However, the subject of whether an "individual", as opposed to a "business".., has a "liability" to pay a tax on the smiple purchase and operation of an aircraft is getting your balls in an uproar. True again, the 16th amendment (as ratified.., another subject?) does give congress the authority to levy and collect a tax on "incomes", but "income" in this case is NOT derived from the purchase or ownership of an aircraft..., unless it is used in a business..!! Oh, and by the way, I have a copy of the incorporation papers for the IRS in the state of Delaware in front of me as I write (smile) which gives it some authority to act as an "agency" with limited powers to collect taxes with regards to alcohol, tobacco, and firearms since it's realignment with the DEA, BATF some years ago. Please keep searching the IRS code for the definition of "income"..!! Now.., back to the subject 45 treads back..., and no name calling..!! Yes, the income isn't derived from using the airplane, but when you sell it, you may well generate income in the form of a capital gain. Matt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Matt for a decent question. The best way to answer is to remind you
an aircraft, when bought, sold, or held by an individual "person" is NOT deemed "real property" per se.., as others would have you believe, and therefore is not automatically seen as a "gain", simply because at that stage it is "personal property", not real property unless (and here we go again), the aircraft is brought, held, or used in the course of a business, or part of some inventory for sale. It is "business activities".., NOT individual purchases that generate "income" (as defined) through their business P/L statements, which make these businesses "libel" to pay a tax (after assessment)..! So now, back to the "individual" as a "tax payer"..!! The IRS code (surprisingly enough) nowhere "defines" income to the individual as having an "income." Then here is the sticky point with the tax guys, as everybody has bought into the "idea" (not in the code) that an individual is a "person" with a liability or duty to pay a tax on income "before" having been properly accessed!! This one question is the very one the IRS has yet to ever supply me with an answer for. Every time they have mailed me a "Notice of Deficiency" I have simply asked them for the date, and by whom I was accessed the amount of deficiency..!! It has never gone beyond this stage for lo these past 22 years..!! Now, call me an idiot, a liar, or whatever.., but do the research..!! We should all just go about our "business", and if the IRS comes to you.., then just ask as by "law" they must answer you..!! Worst case matter is.., if you think you might owe some money.., then hold it aside in a saving account drawing interest and pay them later.., AFTER they have proved that you are the "person" that owes the tax to begin with. They can't fine you, or add penalties and interest as long as you respond to their notice in a "timely manner", and they know it..!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
81mm wrote:
Thanks Matt for a decent question. The best way to answer is to remind you an aircraft, when bought, sold, or held by an individual "person" is NOT deemed "real property" per se.., as others would have you believe, and therefore is not automatically seen as a "gain", simply because at that stage it is "personal property", not real property unless (and here we go again), the aircraft is brought, held, or used in the course of a business, or part of some inventory for sale. It is "business activities".., NOT individual purchases that generate "income" (as defined) through their business P/L statements, which make these businesses "libel" to pay a tax (after assessment)..! So now, back to the "individual" as a "tax payer"..!! The IRS code (surprisingly enough) nowhere "defines" income to the individual as having an "income." Then here is the sticky point with the tax guys, as everybody has bought into the "idea" (not in the code) that an individual is a "person" with a liability or duty to pay a tax on income "before" having been properly accessed!! This one question is the very one the IRS has yet to ever supply me with an answer for. Every time they have mailed me a "Notice of Deficiency" I have simply asked them for the date, and by whom I was accessed the amount of deficiency..!! It has never gone beyond this stage for lo these past 22 years..!! Now, call me an idiot, a liar, or whatever.., but do the research..!! We should all just go about our "business", and if the IRS comes to you.., then just ask as by "law" they must answer you..!! Worst case matter is.., if you think you might owe some money.., then hold it aside in a saving account drawing interest and pay them later.., AFTER they have proved that you are the "person" that owes the tax to begin with. They can't fine you, or add penalties and interest as long as you respond to their notice in a "timely manner", and they know it..!! Bunch of babbling nonsense. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/25/05 09:30, "81mm" wrote:
Thanks Matt for a decent question. The best way to answer is to remind you an aircraft, when bought, sold, or held by an individual "person" is NOT deemed "real property" per se.., as others would have you believe, and therefore is not automatically seen as a "gain", simply because at that stage it is "personal property", not real property unless (and here we go again), the aircraft is brought, held, or used in the course of a business, or part of some inventory for sale. It is "business activities".., NOT individual purchases that generate "income" (as defined) through their business P/L statements, which make these businesses "libel" to pay a tax (after assessment)..! So now, back to the "individual" as a "tax payer"..!! The IRS code (surprisingly enough) nowhere "defines" income to the individual as having an "income." Then here is the sticky point with the tax guys, as everybody has bought into the "idea" (not in the code) that an individual is a "person" with a liability or duty to pay a tax on income "before" having been properly accessed!! This one question is the very one the IRS has yet to ever supply me with an answer for. Every time they have mailed me a "Notice of Deficiency" I have simply asked them for the date, and by whom I was accessed the amount of deficiency..!! It has never gone beyond this stage for lo these past 22 years..!! Now, call me an idiot, a liar, or whatever.., but do the research..!! We should all just go about our "business", and if the IRS comes to you.., then just ask as by "law" they must answer you..!! Worst case matter is.., if you think you might owe some money.., then hold it aside in a saving account drawing interest and pay them later.., AFTER they have proved that you are the "person" that owes the tax to begin with. They can't fine you, or add penalties and interest as long as you respond to their notice in a "timely manner", and they know it..!! I don't know what you said here, probably because your return key is broken on your keyboard. In any case, from the instructions for Schedule D: "Generally, gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for personal use is a capital gain." "A capital asset is any property held by you except..." (What follows doesn't include an airplane held by an individual for personal use.) - Don If you're faced with a forced landing, fly the thing as far into the crash as possible. - Bob Hoover |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 14th 05 08:14 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |