A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Interesting Departure Procedu MRB Trixy Two



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 16th 04, 03:15 AM
Robert Henry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I pulled up the Garmin 500 sim and put 199 in for TRIXY in OBS mode.
This puts the 199 radial just about right through the BIITO BCM on the LOC
BC RWY 8. That fix is 3.9 miles west of the airport, and that runway is
7000 ft long. So, it would be about 5 miles to go 1300' from a field
elevation of 557, which is required by the 300' per NM in the ODP.

Now, the interesting thing was that I accidentally selected 199 from TRIXY
(as diagrammed) when I put the GPS in OBS mode after putting the DP in the
FPL. If you actually use the 199 radial from LDN as written, the point in
space is 1.15NM east of BIITO, but that's still 4 miles from MADNK (the
beginning of RWY 26). Just barely flying the minimum would put you 20
seconds past the 199 from LDN assuming a standard rate left turn. If
performance exceeds the minimums by 300' per nm, I would presume this is a
non-issue, but I could use some instrument DP practice.


--

Bob
PP-ASEL-IA, A/IGI

"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
s.com...


Any other thoughts? Has anyone tried this "for real"?


--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com




  #2  
Old February 16th 04, 03:17 AM
Robert Henry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Actually, "exceeds the minimums by 300' per nm" should read

"exceeds the minimums _of_ 300' per nm"

"Robert Henry" wrote in message
newsBWXb.39710$fZ6.13433@lakeread06...
Well, I pulled up the Garmin 500 sim and put 199 in for TRIXY in OBS mode.
This puts the 199 radial just about right through the BIITO BCM on the LOC
BC RWY 8. That fix is 3.9 miles west of the airport, and that runway is
7000 ft long. So, it would be about 5 miles to go 1300' from a field
elevation of 557, which is required by the 300' per NM in the ODP.

Now, the interesting thing was that I accidentally selected 199 from TRIXY
(as diagrammed) when I put the GPS in OBS mode after putting the DP in the
FPL. If you actually use the 199 radial from LDN as written, the point in
space is 1.15NM east of BIITO, but that's still 4 miles from MADNK (the
beginning of RWY 26). Just barely flying the minimum would put you 20
seconds past the 199 from LDN assuming a standard rate left turn. If
performance exceeds the minimums by 300' per nm, I would presume this is a
non-issue, but I could use some instrument DP practice.


--

Bob
PP-ASEL-IA, A/IGI

"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
s.com...


Any other thoughts? Has anyone tried this "for real"?


--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com






  #3  
Old February 16th 04, 03:14 AM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default





"Robert Henry" wrote in message
newsBWXb.39710$fZ6.13433@lakeread06...

beginning of RWY 26). Just barely flying the minimum would put you 20
seconds past the 199 from LDN assuming a standard rate left turn. If


I flew the procedure with a student in my Cessna 210 simulator (which also
has a Garmin 530) and we reached the designated altitude significantly
before we crossed the radial. If the procedure were flown purely by VOR and
pilotage with no moving map, one could easily lose situational awareness at
that point.

Again, the Jepp charts depict this much better graphically, although I
realize only the text is legally binding.

--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com


  #4  
Old February 16th 04, 04:18 AM
Robert Henry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
s.com...

If the procedure were flown purely by VOR and
pilotage with no moving map, one could easily lose situational awareness

at
that point.

Again, the Jepp charts depict this much better graphically, although I
realize only the text is legally binding.


I wouldn't know about the Jepp - don't have it -, but you're right about the
in situ problem. I didn't even think about the 160 notation, which presumes
that flying through the radial is likely even though it is depicted as a
straight intercept to join the radial.

But I have to wonder why or how one would fly a DP and use pilotage in this
case.


  #5  
Old February 16th 04, 07:34 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Robert Henry wrote:

Well, I pulled up the Garmin 500 sim and put 199 in for TRIXY in OBS mode.
This puts the 199 radial just about right through the BIITO BCM on the LOC
BC RWY 8. That fix is 3.9 miles west of the airport, and that runway is
7000 ft long. So, it would be about 5 miles to go 1300' from a field
elevation of 557, which is required by the 300' per NM in the ODP.


It's 2.6 miles from the departure end of 26 to the radial assuming no VOR
system errors (not a good assumption unless you're using GPS). And, the 300
feet per mile is the minimum climb gradient. If my airplane does 500 feet per
mile I will be at 1,800 prior to the radial.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Requirement to fly departure procedures [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 77 October 15th 03 06:39 PM
Instrument Approaches and procedure turns.... Cecil E. Chapman Instrument Flight Rules 58 September 18th 03 10:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.