![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been in CAP for about a year. If you like hanging around airplane
people its a good social outlet. Actually flying missions requires a good commitment. In our squardron about 15% of the FAA licensed pilots are certified as mission pilots. The reason is just the long line of training, written tests and practical tests you go through before you actually get to fly missions. I've heard people say they get to mission pilot in 6 months but for most pilots it seems to be about 3 years. Then you have currency requirements. Anyone who has been in the military can appreciate the months of dely you run into sometimes just waiting for approval for the training you just finished. I'm not trying to talk anyone out of anything (obviously since I've stuck with it) but rather to set realisitic expectations. On the possitive side, our squardron is scheduled to get a brand new glass cockpit 182. The FBO next door is renting the same plane for $200/hr. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the CAP "rental" rate now, anyway? When I got out of CAP in
2001, it was about $65. Chris G. Robert M. Gary wrote: I've been in CAP for about a year. If you like hanging around airplane people its a good social outlet. Actually flying missions requires a good commitment. In our squardron about 15% of the FAA licensed pilots are certified as mission pilots. The reason is just the long line of training, written tests and practical tests you go through before you actually get to fly missions. I've heard people say they get to mission pilot in 6 months but for most pilots it seems to be about 3 years. Then you have currency requirements. Anyone who has been in the military can appreciate the months of dely you run into sometimes just waiting for approval for the training you just finished. I'm not trying to talk anyone out of anything (obviously since I've stuck with it) but rather to set realisitic expectations. On the possitive side, our squardron is scheduled to get a brand new glass cockpit 182. The FBO next door is renting the same plane for $200/hr. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
$35 dry. Although there is talk about waving it for many of us for the
new glass 182. CAP is requiring a good amount of flight training to qualify to fly the glass cockpit and is considering funding the $35 part of it. It makes sense to me because this is maintenance money and you shouldn't have much out-of-pocket maintenance expenses with a plane under warranty. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
I've been in CAP for about a year. If you like hanging around airplane people its a good social outlet. Actually flying missions requires a good commitment. In our squardron about 15% of the FAA licensed pilots are certified as mission pilots. The reason is just the long line of training, written tests and practical tests you go through before you actually get to fly missions. I've heard people say they get to mission pilot in 6 months but for most pilots it seems to be about 3 years. Then you have currency requirements. Anyone who has been in the military can appreciate the months of dely you run into sometimes just waiting for approval for the training you just finished. I'm not trying to talk anyone out of anything (obviously since I've stuck with it) but rather to set realisitic expectations. On the possitive side, our squardron is scheduled to get a brand new glass cockpit 182. The FBO next door is renting the same plane for $200/hr. -Robert I guess the above is what concerns me. I just moved, have no life, and am looking for something to suck up time. Sitting in meetings, though, is not better than sitting on my couch - I actually want to do something. Why are only 15% certified? Is that all that is needed? Would a female, relatively low time (600-ish) pilot fit in? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rachel" wrote Would a female, relatively low time (600-ish) pilot fit in? I would say that a woman pilot, with 600 hours, would fit in anytime, in an aviation based group. You should also check out the EAA chapters in your area, and possibly the nearby surrounding towns. Some chapters are much more active, and have vastly differing personalities. -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Rachel" wrote Would a female, relatively low time (600-ish) pilot fit in? I would say that a woman pilot, with 600 hours, would fit in anytime, in an aviation based group. You should also check out the EAA chapters in your area, and possibly the nearby surrounding towns. Some chapters are much more active, and have vastly differing personalities. Yeah, EAA is something I looked into in college, and it really wasn't for me. Maybe it's the "recreational" part - I just don't quite fit into that group. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rachel" wrote in message . .. Morgans wrote: "Rachel" wrote Would a female, relatively low time (600-ish) pilot fit in? I would say that a woman pilot, with 600 hours, would fit in anytime, in an aviation based group. You should also check out the EAA chapters in your area, and possibly the nearby surrounding towns. Some chapters are much more active, and have vastly differing personalities. Yeah, EAA is something I looked into in college, and it really wasn't for me. Maybe it's the "recreational" part - I just don't quite fit into that group. A number of EAA chapters abhor anyone other than white males over the age of 70. A recent visit to a rather mature chapter involved a discussion as to whether Cessna 150s came from the factory with a nose wheel or a tailwheel. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Stadt wrote:
A number of EAA chapters abhor anyone other than white males over the age of 70. A recent visit to a rather mature chapter involved a discussion as to whether Cessna 150s came from the factory with a nose wheel or a tailwheel. LOL, that's kind of the idea that I got from the chapter in Indiana that I visited. Don't get me wrong, I love sitting around talking about flying (and all my flying buddies are men), but at some point it becomes ridiculous. Plus, homebuilts and warbirds aren't my thing. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rachel wrote: Why are only 15% certified? Is that all that is needed? Would a female, relatively low time (600-ish) pilot fit in? I checked into a local Senior squadron to check things out (know a few peeps in it) and while I WANT to join up, I honestly have too many irons in the fire at this moment. My impression is, the 15% number is the end result of the many steps required to become a mission pilot. You have to be qualified in lesser positions first, and each level of qualification may require ACTUAL mission experience before being fully qualified. So, if you aren't available when the mission hits, you miss out on an opportunity to check to box. If you were retired, with no job and 24/7 availability or otherwise didnt need to work, I'm sure you could breeze through in no time (a few months at most). Much of the "drag it out" factor is really a function of how many personal time vampires we each have. 600 is actually pretty high time for what I've come across for new CAP members in my area. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|